Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;160(4):971–986. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00740.x

Table 3.

Effects of KMUP-1 on monocrotaline-induced changes in MABP, HR, MPAP, RV/LV + S ratio and PA wall thickness

Treatment MABP (mmHg) HR (bpm) MPAP (mmHg) RV/LV+S (%) Wall thickness (%)
Control 114.5 ± 6.4 365 ± 20 12.3 ± 1.2 21.4 ± 0.4 26.9 ± 2.7
Monocrotaline 102.5 ± 8.2 344 ± 18 30.7 ± 1.2## 44.8 ± 1.0## 59.9 ± 12.7#
KMUP-1
5 mg·kg−1, p.o. 104.4 ± 5.4 342 ± 12 21.8 ± 2.9* 31.5 ± 0.7* 30.7 ± 8.6*
1 mg·kg−1, i.p. 100.2 ± 4.0 384 ± 17 18.7 ± 4.6* 35.8 ± 1.0* 40.8 ± 3.5*

Data in the table are means ± s.e. of n= 6.

*

P < 0.05 versus monocrotaline;

#

P < 0.05,

##

P < 0.01 versus control.

Twenty-one days after monocrotaline injection (i.p.), rats were anaesthetized; MABP, HR and MPAP were measured and then samples were taken for analysis. KMUP-1 or vehicle was given daily for 21 days after monocrotaline.

HR, heart rate; MABP, mean arterial blood pressure; MPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; PA, pulmonary artery; RV/LV + S, weight ratio of right ventricular wall area to left ventricular wall area plus septum.