Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 17;6(4):478–481. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.1028

Table 2.

Comparison of nest survival models. The model including only fat class as predictive factor (φ[fat class]) best explained the variation in the data and had a significant better fit (χ2=5.86, p < 0.016) than the next best model in which survival was constant, i.e. independent of fat class and time (φ[.]; φ = survival probability).

model AICc delta AICc AICc weight model likelihood parameters deviance
φ[fat class] 122.461 0 0.871 1.000 2 118.405
φ[.] 126.278 3.82 0.129 0.148 1 124.260
φ[time] 160.136 37.37 0 0 34 79.130
φ[fat class * time] 229.035 106.57 0 0 60 62.410