Table 2.
Comparison of nest survival models. The model including only fat class as predictive factor (φ[fat class]) best explained the variation in the data and had a significant better fit (χ2=5.86, p < 0.016) than the next best model in which survival was constant, i.e. independent of fat class and time (φ[.]; φ = survival probability).
model | AICc | delta AICc | AICc weight | model likelihood | parameters | deviance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
φ[fat class] | 122.461 | 0 | 0.871 | 1.000 | 2 | 118.405 |
φ[.] | 126.278 | 3.82 | 0.129 | 0.148 | 1 | 124.260 |
φ[time] | 160.136 | 37.37 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 79.130 |
φ[fat class * time] | 229.035 | 106.57 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 62.410 |