. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010 May;39(3):351–361. doi: 10.1080/15374411003691784

Table 6.

Associations between the three hypothesized socioemotional dispositions dimensions of the CADS-Y and conduct disorder assessed in joint multiple regression analyses in Study 1 (Georgia Health and Behavior Study).

	Caretaker-Rated			Youth-Rated
	Conduct Disorder			Conduct Disorder
	β	χ²	Pseudo R²	β	χ²	Pseudo R²
Prosociality	−1.02	55.45	.35	−0.90	89.82	.54
Negative Emotionality	0.62	24.08		0.68	58.56
Daring	0.56	20.03		0.70	66.10

Note: All coefficients p < .0001; all joint models controlled for the two other socioemotional dispositions, age, sex, and race-ethnicity; statistically significant interactions among the socioemotional dispositions are reported in the Results section for Study 1. Pseudo R² is defined in the Data Analysis section for Study 1.