Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2010 Aug 3;205(3):335–349. doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2367-3

Table 1.

Results of Regression Analysis

Ramp
time		 300 ms 400 ms 500 ms 700 ms 1400 ms
VUCM, force increase
  a1 (×10−3) 2.27±0.79 7.15±4.99 6.4±4.42 7.15±5.69 5.46±3.24
  c1(×10−4) 0.15±0.45 −2.74±2.36 −1.76±1.60 −3.12±2.85 −1.45±1.02
VUCM, force decrease
  a1(×10−3) 2.21±0.58 4.77±2.92 3.44±1.88 3.62±2.52 3.81±2.14
  c1(×10−5) −1.02±3.74 −14.57±10.37 −5.51±7.78 −10.71±10.14 −5.21±5.57
VORT, force increase
  a2(×10−4) 3.55±0.73 3.69±.77 1.21±0.43 2.91±0.76 2.08±0.4
  b2(×10−4) 8.48±0.81 8.9±0.97 6.62±0.76 8.73±1.3 9.42±1.6
  c2(×10−5) −4.2±0.7 −4.3±0.8 −2.1±0.4 −3.9±0.8 −3.2±0.6
VORT, force decrease
  a2(×10−4) −1.03±0.72 −3.71±0.73 −1.84±0.71 −2.19±0.55 −2.96±0.75
  b2(×10−4) 10.95±1.62 9.33±1.1 9.64±1.53 9.37±1.29 10.06±2.15
  c2(×10−5) 1.34±1.61 6.35±1.67 2.29±1.44 3.05±1.14 5.75±1.7

Mean (± SEM) of the coefficients in the regression analyses of VUCM and VORT using Eq. (8) over different ramp times. All fits were highly significant. No consistent change in any of the parameters was observed across conditions.