Table 2.
Cross | Stage examined | genotype |
Res sites | Litter total | % Hm (p) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wt | Het | Hm | |||||
RST434 × RST434* | P 15 | 35 | 60 | 0 | 95 | 0 | |
RST434 × RST434** | E 10.5 | 18 | 43 | 0 | 19 | 80 | 23.8 (0.79) |
RST434 × RST434# | E 7.5 | 18 | 27 | 15 | 0 | 60 | 25 (1.00) |
RST434 × RST434# | E 6.5 | 11 | 27 | 13 | 0 | 51 | 25.5 (0.94) |
RST434 × 699Lex$ | E 7.5 | ND | ND | 14 | 0 | 52 | 26.9 (0.75) |
699Lex × 699Lex$ | E 7.5 | ND | ND | 29 | 0 | 114 | 25.4 (0.91) |
Genotype determined by PCR (Materials and Methods)
Resorption sites (Res sites) were counted and surviving embryos genotyped by PCR.
Genotypes were inferred from the intensity of X-gal staining and embryo morphology. The relationship between these characteristics and genotype was verified by PCR (Materials and Methods).
homozygous genotype inferred from mutant morphology. Wt, wild type; Het, heterozygous; Hm, homozygous; nd, not determined.