Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Prim Prev. 2010 Aug;31(4):235–245. doi: 10.1007/s10935-010-0217-5

Table 2.

Adapted and dropped activities and reasons for the changes among 93 agencies implementing Healthy Relationships.

Changes
Reasons for Change
Adapted Dropped Simplify Did not understand Time Constraints Community-fit


Intervention component N % N % N % N % N % N %
Disclosure to family, friends
 PFR 13 11 7 6 15 75 6 30 11 55 15 75
 Risk Continuum 11 12 0 0 7 64 3 28 4 37 10 91
 Decision Grid 16 17 3 3 16 84 12 60 9 47 17 89
 Skills Movie Clips 25 27 3 3 13 46 6 22 12 54 20 74
Disclosure to sex partners
 PFR 11 12 9 9 12 67 7 39 12 67 11 61
 Risk Continuum 9 10 2 2 4 40 2 20 2 20 9 90
 Decision Grid 13 14 2 2 13 93 10 71 8 43 13 93
 Skills Movie Clips 26 28 2 2 11 42 6 33 13 50 19 73
Safer sex/risk reduction
 PFR 11 12 7 8 11 59 7 40 12 71 9 53
 Risk Continuum 8 9 0 0 4 50 1 12 0 6 75
 Decision Grid 12 13 1 1 10 83 8 67 7 58 9 75
 Skills Movie Clips 29 31 2 2 12 41 6 21 11 38 21 72

Note: PFR = Personalized Feedback Report; Percentages of reasons for adaptations do not sum to 100% because participants could indicate more than one reason.