Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr 28;117(6):1064–1077.e35. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.031

Table 3.

Distribution of Focal/Grid Laser Treatments Received

Sham + Prompt Laser Ranibizumab + Prompt Laser Ranibizumab + Deferred Laser Triamcinolone + Prompt Laser
Number of laser treatments received prior to the 1 year visit, no. (%)* N = 274 N = 171 N = 178 N = 176
 0 1 (<1%) 0 124 (70%) 1 (1%)
 1 35 (13%) 53 (31%) 36 (20%) 46 (26%)
 2 75 (27%) 54 (32%) 17 (10%) 53 (30%)
 3 107 (39%) 46 (27%) 1 (1%) 49 (28%)
 4 56 (20%) 18 (11%) 0 27 (15%)
Proportion of eyes receiving laser at 48 week visit, no. (%)* 242 (26%) 155 (16%) 160 (8%) 154 (21%)
Number of laser treatments received prior to the 2 year visit, no. (%)§ N = 163 N = 106 N = 112 N = 103
 0 1 (1%) 0 65 (58%) 0
 1 14 (9%) 21 (20%) 21 (19%) 16 (16%)
 2 28 (17%) 24 (23%) 7 (6%) 23 (22%)
 3 38 (23%) 23 (22%) 11 (10%) 28 (27%)
 4 29 (18%) 22 (21%) 8 (7%) 13 (13%)
 5 25 (15%) 9 (8%) 0 11 (11%)
 6 13 (8%) 5 (5%) 0 7 (7%)
 7 15 (9%) 2 (2%) 0 5 (5%)
*

Includes study participants completing the 1-year (52 week) visit.

One eye did not receive laser until post 1-year due to an adverse event unrelated to study treatment.

One eye did not receive laser until after 1-year due to missing 2 consecutive visits at the initial time of required laser treatment.

§

Includes study participants completing the 2-year visit.

Three eyes deviated from the protocol and received laser prior to 24 weeks (2 were given laser at the 1 week safety visit and 1 at the 20 week visit).