Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;192(18):4535–4540. doi: 10.1128/JB.00284-10

TABLE 1.

Diffusion coefficients determined for GFP constructs in the cytoplasm of E. coli cells (unless indicated otherwise)a

Proteinb Molecular mass (kDa) D (μm2 s−1) Treatment Source or reference
GFP in water 27 87 26
GFP 27 7.7 ± 2.5 Induced with 100 μM IPTGc 6
GFP 27 3.6 ± 0.7 Induced with 1 mM IPTG 6
EYFP 26.5 7.08 ± 0.3 12
GFP-His6 27+ 4.0 ± 2.0 6
cMBP-GFP 72 2.5 ± 0.6 6
CheY-GFP 41 4.6 ± 0.8 3
CFP-CheW-YFP 71 1.5 ± 0.05 12
CFP-CheR-YFP 86.2 1.7 ± 0.05 12
torA-GFP 30 9.0 ± 2.1 Cephalexin 18
GFP 27 9.8 ± 3.6 Cephalexin 28
GFP 27 0.4 ± 0.3 After osmotic upshock with NaCl 28
GFP 27 6.3 ± 1.1 25
GFP 27 3.1 ± 1.0 After osmotic shock 25
torA-GFP2 in ΔtatABCDE strain 57 7.5 ± 3.9 Cephalexin, 2% arabinose This study
GFP2 27 9.1 ± 5.1 Cephalexin This study
torA-GFP2 57 8.3 ± 4.2 Cephalexin, 500 μM arabinose This study
torA-GFP3 84 6.3 ± 2.6 Cephalexin, 200 μM arabinose This study
torA-GFP4 111 5.5 ± 1.9 Cephalexin, 1 mM arabinose This study
torA-GFP5 138 2.8 ± 1.5 Cephalexin, 800 μM arabinose This study
AmiA-GFP 58 1.8 ± 0.8 2% arabinose This study
AmiA-GFP 58 1.8 ± 1.2 Cephalexin, 2% arabinose This study
AmiAnoSP-GFP 58 7.1 ± 3.6 Cephalexin, 2% arabinose This study
NlpA-GFP 55 2.1 ± 1.4 Cephalexin, 2% arabinose This study
NlpAnoLB-GFP 55 2.7 ± 3.2 Cephalexin, 2% arabinose This study
a

The techniques used were FRAP and photoactivation of a red-emitting fluorescence state of GFP (6), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (3), confocal FRAP (12, 18), pulsed FRAP (28), and continuous photobleaching with evanescent illumination (25).

b

EYFP, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein; cMBP, cytoplasmic maltose-binding protein.

c

IPTG, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside.