Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 6;78(9):4040–4050. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00221-10

TABLE 1.

Identification of P. brasiliensis enolase by peptide mass fingerprinta

Positionb Identified amino acid sequencec Mass
Exptl (in-gel digestion) Theoretical (in silico digestion)
16-32 R.GNPTVEVDVVTETGLHR.A 1,822.9489 1,822.9293
33-50 R.AIVPSGASTGQHEACELR.D 1,882.9548 1,825.8861
90-103 K.VDEFLNKLDGTPNK.S 1,589.8751 1,588.8678
106-120 K.LGANAILGVSLAIAK.A 1,410.9979 1,410.8678
164-184 R.LAFQEFMIVPTAAPSFSEALR.Q 2,325.2178 2,325.1947
243-254 K.IALDIASSEFYK.A 1,356.7701 1,356.7045
274-285 K.WLTYEQLADLYK.K 1,542.8513 1,542.7838
314-331 K.TCDLQVVADDLTVTNPIR.I 2,030.0239 1,973.0008
377-393 R.SGETEDVTIADIVVGLR.A 1,773.9489 1,773.9228
411-416 K.LNQILR.I 756.4464 756.4726
a

Protein scores higher than 76 are significant (P < 0.05). Peptide masses matched with PbEno (GenBank accession number EF558735.1), presenting a score of 113 and coverage of 34.25% of the whole deduced sequence.

b

Position corresponds to the peptide fragment detected by mass spectrometry.

c

The sequence within the periods represents the amino acids of the detected fragment. The amino acids outside of the periods represent the amino acids which remain within the protein following tryptic digestion.