Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 7;5:271–276. doi: 10.2147/cia.s12640

Table 2.

Veralipride efficiency with several evaluated schedules

Schedule N Time Study Results
David36 A 47 2 months Double blind, placebo controlled, crossover Hot flush reduction 80%
Residual effect 3 months after withdrawal
Wesel39 B 40 Double blind, randomized Similar decrease in hot flushes between groups
Melis40 C 40 1 month Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled 85% reduction
Vercellini41 D 36 2 months Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled Reduction 78% vs placebo 33%
Carranza-Lira7 E 75 3 months Comparative, randomized, placebo controlled 80% reduction in frequency, 71% in intensity, 82% duration, sweats 66.6%
Morgante31 F 29 6 months Randomized, comparative Without differences between in number of hot flushes and Kupperman’s index
Hot flushes decrease in 63% and 66% at 3rd and 6th month respectively
Boukobza42 G 166 3 months Open, multicentric Hot flush reduction 89.9%
In 64.5% residual effect 3 months after withdrawal
Vercellini43 H 25 28 days Open, observational trial 92% of patients have decrease in frequency and intensity of hot flushes
Marais44 I 1–14 months Comparative, placebo controlled 48%–72% decrease

Notes: A, 100 mg/day for 20 days and 10 days drug free; B, 100 mg/day for 20 days and 10 days drug free versus conjugated estrogens 1.25 mg/day; C, 100 mg/day; D, 100 mg/day; E, 100 mg/day from Monday to Friday; F, Raloxifene plus veralipride in alternate days versus raloxifene and veralipride in alternate months; G, 100 mg/day for 20 days and 10 days drug free; H, 100 mg/day 20 days.