Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 27;103(5):668–675. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605736

Table 2. Cox model incorporating time-dependent effects of prognostic variables.

  HR B 1 95% CI P-value T B 2 95% CI P-value
Univariate analysis
 Size (n=9793) 2.74 1.01 2.39–3.14 <0.001 0.79 −0.24 0.72–0.86 <0.001
 Grade (n=10 066) 5.30 1.67 4.40–6.40 <0.001 0.53 −0.63 0.47–0.59 <0.001
 Nodal status (n=9428) 4.02 1.39 3.30–4.90 <0.001 0.76 −0.27 0.67–0.87 <0.001
 ER (n=10 592) 0.17 −1.77 0.14–0.20 <0.001 2.49 0.91 2.24–2.76 <0.001
 PR (n=8802) 0.15 −1.90 0.13–0.19 <0.001 2.45 0.90 2.19–2.75 <0.001
 HER2 (n=8100) 2.85 1.05 2.34–3.48 <0.001 0.70 −0.36 0.61–0.80 <0.001
 BCL2 (n=7803) 0.21 −1.56 0.17–0.25 <0.001 2.02 0.70 1.78–2.31 <0.001
                 
Multivariate analysis: Model 1 (n=6738)
 ER 0.39 −0.94 0.29–0.51 <0.001 1.99 0.69 1.65–2.41 <0.001
 PR 0.30 −1.20 0.23–0.40 <0.001 1.76 0.57 1.49–2.08 <0.001
 HER2 1.50 0.41 1.20–1.89 <0.001 0.97 −0.03 0.82–1.14 0.69
 BCL2 0.62 −0.48 0.48–0.80 <0.001 1.09 0.09 0.92–1.29 0.32
                 
Multivariate analysis: Model 2 (n=5445)
 Size 1.50 0.41 1.37–1.64 <0.001 NA      
 Grade 2.89 1.06 2.18–3.80 <0.001 0.67 −0.40 0.57–0.79 <0.001
 Nodal status 3.21 1.17 2.50–4.12 <0.001 0.80 −0.22 0.68–0.94 0.006
 ER 0.41 −0.89 0.30–0.54 <0.001 2.07 0.73 1.70–2.50 <0.001
 PR 0.33 −1.11 0.24–0.46 <0.001 1.69 0.52 1.41–2.03 <0.001
 HER2 1.31 0.27 1.15–1.50 <0.001 NA      
 BCL2 0.76 −0.25 0.66–0.88 <0.001 NA      

Abbreviations: B1=log(hazard ratio); B2=log(time effect); BCL2=B-cell lymphoma 2; CI=confidence interval; ER=oestrogen receptor; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR=hazard ratio (mortality); NA=not applicable; PR=progesterone receptor; T=time effect.

B2 is positive when the HR increases with time and negative when the HR decreases with time.

Tumour size and grade were treated as continuous variables in the univariate and multivariate analyses.