Table 1.
Information about the 53 SSRs employed in this study
| SSR locus | Number of alleles | Average number of alleles per genotype | Number of unique allelic combinations | Number of allelic combinations | Frequency of most abundant allelic combination | PIC | LG | Source of SSR | Ghislain et al. (2004)—number of alleles/PIC | Ghislain et al. (2009)—number of alleles/PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STI009 | 15 | 2.23 | 56 | 125 | 24 | 0.78 | 1 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM1029 | 11 | 1.52 | 34 | 59 | 121 | 0.71 | 1 | Milbourne (1998) | ||
| STM1049 | 10 | 1.45 | 9 | 24 | 187 | 0.58 | 1 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 9/0.77 | 9/0.54 |
| STM5127 | 8 | 1.64 | 29 | 63 | 113 | 0.67 | 1 | Rios et al. (2007) | 17/0.85 | |
| STI029 | 16 | 2.67 | 80 | 162 | 15 | 0.83 | 2 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STI052 | 10 | 2.19 | 27 | 71 | 47 | 0.73 | 2 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM0038 | 12 | 2.08 | 23 | 71 | 45 | 0.77 | 2 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1030 | 9 | 1.65 | 19 | 42 | 85 | 0.59 | 2 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM2022 | 7 | 1.42 | 10 | 30 | 192 | 0.51 | 2 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 13/0.75 | 7/0.62 |
| STM1054 | 8 | 1.02 | 7 | 11 | 380 | 0.06 | 3 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STI001 | 12 | 2.07 | 38 | 78 | 96 | 0.67 | 4 | Feingold et al. (2005) | 8/0.69 | |
| STI012 | 13 | 2.74 | 47 | 123 | 17 | 0.81 | 4 | Feingold et al. (2005) | 15/0.79 | |
| STI055 | 9 | 2.24 | 26 | 57 | 53 | 0.66 | 4 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM3016 | 10 | 1.71 | 30 | 64 | 60 | 0.78 | 4 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM3020 | 2 | 0.84 | 1 | 2 | 358 | 0 | 4 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM3023 | 9 | 1.55 | 10 | 35 | 72 | 0.72 | 4 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 5/0.56 | |
| STM0013 | 25 | 2.37 | 55 | 103 | 76 | 0.74 | 5 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1041 | 6 | 1.79 | 7 | 23 | 93 | 0.59 | 5 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM5148 | 17 | 2.77 | 152 | 232 | 15 | 0.87 | 5 | Bradshaw et al. (2008) | ||
| STI016 | 14 | 1.78 | 31 | 62 | 51 | 0.72 | 6 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STI045 | 8 | 1.84 | 8 | 24 | 147 | 0.5 | 6 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM0001 | 16 | 1.67 | 58 | 101 | 132 | 0.72 | 6 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1100 | 26 | 1.64 | 51 | 83 | 59 | 0.72 | 6 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STI040 | 10 | 1.02 | 10 | 23 | 231 | 0.56 | 7 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM0028 | 12 | 2.35 | 28 | 70 | 42 | 0.72 | 7 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM0052 | 22 | 1.47 | 54 | 94 | 53 | 0.8 | 7 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| SSR1 | 14 | 2.7 | 98 | 168 | 16 | 0.82 | 8 | Kawchuk et al. (1996) | ||
| STGBSS | 11 | 2.32 | 27 | 75 | 35 | 0.74 | 8 | Ghislain et al. (2004) | 8/0.74 | 16/0.84 |
| STI003 | 19 | 2.21 | 50 | 88 | 53 | 0.69 | 8 | Feingold et al. (2005) | 17/0.75 | |
| STI022 | 8 | 1.93 | 13 | 45 | 49 | 0.77 | 8 | Feingold et al. (2005) | 10/0.71 | |
| STM0024 | 13 | 1.46 | 36 | 65 | 196 | 0.55 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1001 | 9 | 1.71 | 35 | 73 | 90 | 0.73 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1005 | 8 | 1.08 | 11 | 25 | 219 | 0.45 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1016 | 7 | 2.28 | 19 | 65 | 41 | 0.74 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 9/0.78 | 17/0.84 |
| STM1024 | 10 | 1.93 | 18 | 49 | 93 | 0.56 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1055 | 10 | 1.73 | 19 | 39 | 120 | 0.68 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1057 | 7 | 1.8 | 9 | 45 | 118 | 0.62 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1104 | 8 | 1.73 | 19 | 47 | 117 | 0.6 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 17/0.89 | 14/0.88 |
| STM1105 | 14 | 2.54 | 86 | 151 | 25 | 0.8 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM3010 | 7 | 1.6 | 9 | 30 | 71 | 0.66 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM3015 | 20 | 1.89 | 81 | 132 | 88 | 0.76 | 8 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STSS1 | 14 | 2.64 | 73 | 132 | 29 | 0.78 | 8 | Kawchuk et al. (1996) | ||
| STWAX1 | 10 | 1.82 | 22 | 58 | 116 | 0.61 | 8 | Kawchuk et al. (1996) | ||
| STWAX2 | 18 | 2.45 | 79 | 131 | 30 | 0.78 | 8 | Ghislain et al. (2004) | 8/0.73 | 15/0.78 |
| STM1051 | 20 | 1.86 | 73 | 121 | 109 | 0.66 | 9 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM0051 | 6 | 1.69 | 8 | 21 | 132 | 0.5 | 10 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM1106 | 19 | 1.23 | 29 | 57 | 211 | 0.58 | 10 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | 15/0.82 | 17/0.82 |
| STM2012 | 19 | 1.72 | 46 | 92 | 42 | 0.79 | 10 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STI018 | 8 | 2.25 | 34 | 66 | 90 | 0.66 | 11 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STI028 | 13 | 1.88 | 34 | 67 | 110 | 0.54 | 11 | Feingold et al. (2005) | ||
| STM2005 | 13 | 2.41 | 30 | 82 | 29 | 0.82 | 11 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM0003 | 16 | 2 | 59 | 116 | 24 | 0.82 | 12 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| STM2028 | 15 | 1.66 | 38 | 74 | 78 | 0.67 | 12 | Milbourne et al. (1998) | ||
| Average | 12.32 | 1.89 | 36.89 | 74.45 | 0.66 |
The number of alleles, average number of alleles per genotype, number of allelic combinations and number of unique allelic combinations detected are presented. The frequency of the most abundant allelic combination, the PIC-value and linkage group according to literature are enlisted as well together with the source of each SSR. The outermost columns specify the number of alleles and PIC-values found by Ghislain et al. (2004, 2009)