Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;160(6):1496–1508. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00803.x

Table 1.

Myogenic tone after addition of blockers; EC50-values and maximum relaxation for bradykinin in the presence of SNP (1 µM), NS309 (1 µM) and CyPPA (6 µM)

Treatment n Myogenic tone Contraction (Nm−1) U46619 (0.1 µM) Contraction (Nm−1) Bradykinin
EC50 (nM) Maximum relaxation (%)
Control 8 0.28 ± 0.06 1.0 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 1.1 96.3 ± 2.9
SNP 7 0.31 ± 0.04 1.0 ± 0.1 2.2 ± 1.4 92.2 ± 2.8
Control 8 0.30 ± 0.04 1.0 ± 0.1 3.9 ± 1.2 95.7 ± 1.9
NS309 8 0.26 ± 0.05 1.0 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.2* 97.4 ± 1.1
NS309/charybdotoxin 8 0.38 ± 0.10 1.0 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2* 98.3 ± 1.1
NS309/apamin 8 0.48 ± 0.12 0.9 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 1.4 75.8 ± 9.4*
NS309/charybdotoxin/apamin 8 0.55 ± 0.13 1.0 ± 0.1 3.7 ± 1.5 76.8 ± 7.5*
Control 7 0.26 ± 0.07 1.0 ± 0.1 2.6 ± 0.5 95.4 ± 4.6
CyPPA 7 0.31 ± 0.06 0.9 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2* 95.1 ± 1.9
CyPPA/apamin 7 0.45 ± 0.09 1.0 ± 0.1 3.2 ± 1.4 81.8 ± 9.3

Mean ± SEM Student's t-test.

*

P < 0.05 from their respective controls.

CyPPA, cyclohexyl-[2-(3,5-dimethyl-pyrazol-1-yl)-6-methyl-pyrimidin-4- yl]-amine; NS309, 6,7-dichloro-1H-indole-2,3-dione 3-oxime; SNP, sodium nitroprusside; U46619, 9,11-dideoxy-9a,11a-epoxymethanoprostaglandin F.