Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;13(6):719–726. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0337

Table 3.

Age Group Comparisons of End-of-Life Care (n = 396)

 
Unadjusted descriptive statistics
Adjusted group comparisons
Postmortem variables Total sample n = 396 Older aged (≥65) n = 126 Middle-aged (45–64) n = 214 Younger aged (20–44) n = 56 Older aged vs middle-aged Middle-aged vs younger aged Older aged vs younger aged
Life-Prolonging Treatment n % n % n % n % OR (CI) OR (CI) OR (CI)
ICU 37 (9.4) 9 (7.2) 20 (9.4) 8 (14.3) 0.81 (0.35-1.88) 0.57 (0.23-1.42) 0.29 (0.09-0.92)
Ventilator 28 (7.1) 5 (4.0) 17 (8.0) 6 (10.7) 0.51 (0.18-1.43) 0.72 (0.27-1.93) 0.27 (0.07-1.00)
Chemotherapy 25 (6.3) 8 (6.4) 14 (6.5) 3 (5.4) 0.51 (0.18-1.46) 1.46 (0.40-5.40) 1.20 (0.31-4.69)
Feeding tube 31 (7.9) 10 (8.0) 13 (6.1) 8 (14.6) 1.33 (0.57-3.13) 0.38 (0.15-0.98) 0.51 (0.19-1.37)
Resuscitation 31 (4.1) 1 (0.8) 10 (4.7) 5 (8.9) 0.16 (0.02-1.29) 0.50 (0.17-1.54) 0.08 (0.01-0.72)
Location of Death                            
ICU 28 (7.1) 5 (4.0) 15 (7.0) 8 (14.3) 0.59 (0.20-1.71) 0.41 (0.16-1.07) 0.20 (0.06-0.70)
Hospital 86 (21.7) 22 (17.5) 48 (22.4) 16 (28.6) 0.72 (0.40-1.27) 0.70 (0.35-1.37) 0.53 (0.25-1.11)
Home 219 (55.3) 71 (56.4) 119 (55.6) 29 (51.8) 1.00 (0.61-1.65) 1.37 (0.73-2.57) 1.24 (0.60-2.57)
Nursing Home 16 (4.0) 7 (5.6) 9 (4.2) 0 (0.0) 1.59 (0.55-4.62) ----- ------------- ----- -------------
Hospice 47 (11.9) 21 (16.7) 23 (10.8) 3 (5.4) 1.45 (0.72-2.92) 2.03 (0.53-7.76) 4.09 (0.91-18.33)
Survival* mdn (Q1-Q3) mdn (Q1-Q3) mdn (Q1-Q3) mdn (Q1-Q3) HR (CI) (CI) HR HR (CI)
Survival time (in days) 146 (62-312) 125 (68-297) 157 (61-313) 143 (60-347) 0.88 (0.68-1.15) 1.07 (0.78-1.49) 0.74 (0.50-1.08)

ICU -Intensive Care Unit; EOL-End of Life; Pt-Patient; psych-psychological; mdn-Median Q1 -Lower Quartile (25%); Q3 -Upper Quartile (75%); HR-Hazard Ratio.

All values in bold are at least p < .05.

*

Survival time was measured from the baseline assessment of advanced cancer patients with a 6 month prognosis.

Adjustments were made by running all Table 1 variables as possible confounders using backwards selection.