Table 4.
Age Group Comparisons of End-of-Life Goal Attainment (n = 327)*
| |
Unadjusted descriptive statistics |
Adjusted group comparisons† |
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline variables | Total sample n = 327 | Older aged (≥65) n = 104 | Middle-aged (45–64) n = 175 | Younger aged (20–44) n = 48 | Older aged vs middle-aged | Middle-aged vs younger aged | Older aged vs younger aged | |||||||
| Goal Attainment | n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | OR | CI | OR | CI | OR | CI |
| Successful Goal Attainment | 222 | (65.9) | 70 | (67.3) | 119 | (68.0) | 33 | (68.8) | 0.76 | (0.42-1.34) | 1.03 | (0.49-2.13) | 0.84 | (0.39-1.84) |
| Wanted and Received LPT | 25 | (7.4) | 6 | (5.8) | 9 | (5.1) | 10 | (20.8) | 1.00 | (0.34-2.98) | 0.21 | (0.08-0.54) | 0.23 | (0.08-0.68) |
| Did Not Want and Avoided LPT | 197 | (58.5) | 64 | (61.5) | 110 | (62.9) | 23 | (47.9) | 0.90 | (0.53-1.53) | 2.38 | (1.20-4.75) | 1.74 | (0.87-3.47) |
| Unsuccessful Goal Attainment | 105 | (31.2) | 34 | (32.7) | 56 | (32.0) | 15 | (31.3) | 1.33 | (0.74-2.36) | 0.98 | (0.47-2.03) | 1.25 | (0.58-2.70) |
| Wanted But Did Not Receive LPT | 70 | (20.8) | 23 | (22.1) | 34 | (19.4) | 13 | (27.1) | 1.27 | (0.14-0.70) | 0.62 | (0.29-1.31) | 0.86 | (0.37-2.02) |
| Did Not Want But Received LPT | 35 | (10.4) | 11 | (10.6) | 22 | (12.6) | 2 | (4.2) | 0.82 | (0.38-1.77) | 3.31 | (0.75-14.60) | 3.29 | (0.64-16.83) |
GA- Goal Attainment; LPT- Life-Prolonging Treatment.
All values in bold are at least p < .05.
Goal Attainment has 4 categories: 1) patient wants and receives life-prolonging treatment 2) patient wants but does not receive life-pronging treatment 3) patient does not want but fails to avoid life-prolonging treatment 4) Patient does not want and avoids life-prolonging treatment. Patient in categories 1 & 4 were grouped as successful Goal Attainment while groups 2 &3 were grouped as unsuccessful Goal Attainment.
Goal Attainment sample was limited by sample size of the “Extend Life” measure of patient treatment preference (N = 327).
Adjustments were made by running all Table 1 variables as possible confounders using backwards selection.