Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2010 Jun 15;51(3-4):214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004

Table 4.

Description of Studies Included for Analysis of Effect Size (Studies published 1988-2009)

Study Health Behaviors and Outcome Measures N (Baseline) Intervention Methods Sample and Recruitment Characteristics Number of Treatment Contacts Length of Treatment (months) Final Assessment (months from baseline) Retention Rate (%) Quality Rating (out of 22)
Anderson, Winett, Wojcik, Winett, & Bowden, 2001 Dieta,c 464 Up to 15 dynamically feedbacks+ or no treatment* delivered at grocery store General population proactively recruited in person at grocery store 15 4 6 45.0 16
Armitage & Conner, 2001 Dietb 801 Behavioral feedback+ or brochure* Employees proactively contacted at worksite 1 1 5 64.5 15
Ausems, Mesters, van Breukelen, & De Vries, 2004 Smokingh 2,376 3 tailored letters+, tailored letters plus in-school lessons, in-school lessons only, or assessment-only control group* Vocational secondary school students in the Netherlands 3 2.5 18 75.4 16
Aveyard, Griffin, Lawrence, & Cheng, 2003 Smokingg 2,471 3 dynamically tailored feedbacks+, counseling, brochure* or manual-only conditions Random sample proactively recruited from medical clinic 3 6 12 50.0 16
Bastani, Maxwell, Bradford, Das, & Yan, 1999 Mammographyi 902 Behavioral feedback + manual+ or brochure only* Proactive random digit dial of general population 1 1 12 84.0 15
Becona & Vasquez, 2001 Smokingg 300 6 weekly non- tailored pamphlets, 6 pamphlets plus 2 tailored letters+, or manual only control group* Respondents to advertisements in newspapers, radio, and local television 6 2 12 82.0 17
Block & Wakimoto et al., 2004 Dietc 481 One-time experience with tailored CD- OM+, CD-ROM plus two reminder telephone calls, or a stress management CD-ROM control condition* Respondents to fliers posted in state agencies serving low- income persons 1 1 2 98.0 18
Bock, Marcus, Pinto, & Forsyth, 2001 Phys Activityj 194 4 dynamically tailored letters and manual+ or brochure only* delivered at home Respondents to fliers and announcements 4 6 12 33.0 16
Borland, Balmford, & Hunt, 2004 Smokingg 1,058 3 dynamically tailored letters+ or brochure-only* delivered at home Callers to cancer info line 5 12 12 70.0 17
Borland, Balmford, Segan, Livingston, & Owen, 2003 Smokingg 1,578 3 dynamically tailored reports+, counseling calls, or manual-only* conditions delivered at home Callers to cancer info line 3 6 12 76.6 17
Brug, Glanz, van Assema, Kok, & Van Breukelen, 1998 Dietb,d,e 762 2 dynamically tailored letters, tailored letter, or brochure-only* conditions delivered at home Respondents to fliers and announcements 2 2 3 91.8 17
Brug, Steenhuis, van Assema, Glanz, & DeVries, 1999 Dietb,d,e 347 Tailored report+ or behavioral feedback-only* delivered at home Proactively recruited employees from worksite 1 1 2 91.0 12
Brug, Steenhuis, van Assema, & de Vries, 1996 Dietb,d,e 507 Tailored letter + or brochure* delivered at home Proactively recruited employees from worksite 1 1 2 51.0 15
Bull, Jamrozik, & Blanksby, 1999 Phys ActivityL 763 Tailored report+, brochure*, or assessment-only plus physician advice delivered at home and clinic Proactively recruited patients from clinic list 1 1 12 57.0 17
Bull, Kreuter, & Scharff, 1999 Phys ActivityL 272 Tailored report+, personalized feedback, brochure* or assessment only delivered at home Proactively recruited patients from clinic list 1 1 3 75.0 17
Burnett, Magel, Harrington, & Taylor, 1989 Dietb 77 Tailored letters+ or informational brochure only* delivered at school Proactively recruited students from high schools 3 3 3 99.0 12
Campbell & Bernhardt et al., 1999 Dietc 459 Tailored +, culturally tailored bulletin, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited from church attendees 1 10 12 82.0 16
Campbell & Carbone et al., 2004 Dietb,c 410 Tailored interactive computer feedback+ or assessment-only* condition delivered at clinic Proactively recruited patients from clinic list 1 0 2 74.8 18
Campbell, DeVellis, Strecher, & Ammerman, 1994 Dietb,c 558 Tailored letter+, brochure*, or assessment-only conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited patients from medical clinic 1 1 4 82.0 18
Campbell & Honess et al., 2004 Dietb 526 Tailored feedback or assessment-only* condition delivered via computer at clinic Proactively recruited patients from medical clinic 1 1 3 72.0 17
Campbell & James et al., 2004 Dieta,c
Phys Activityj
850 4 tailored newsletters+ and targeted videotapes or lay health advisor (LHA)* conditions Proactively recruited church attendees 4 9 12 69.0 19
Campbell & Tessaro et al., 2002 Dietb,c
Phys Activityk
Smokingg
859 2 dynamically tailored letters+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited employees for worksite intervention 2 6 18 63.0 18
Cardinal & Sachs, 1995 Phys Activitym 113 Tailored letter+ or behavior feedback* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited employees for worksite intervention 1 1 7 75.0 10
Champion & Skinner et al., 2002 Mammographyi 1,390 Tailored letter+, counseling calls, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home HMO members contacted via mail and phone 1 1 2 71.0 16
Champion & Skinner et al., 2007 Mammographyi 1,245 Tailored letter+, counseling calls, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home HMO members contacted via mail and phone 1 1 4 91.8 16
Clark & Rakowski et al., 2002 Mammographyi 1,324 2 dynamically tailored letters+, brochure*, or assessment-only conditions delivered at home HMO members contacted via mail and phone 2 6 20 77.0 16
Curry, McBride, Grothaus, Louie, & Wagner, 1995 Smokingg 1,317 Tailored report +manual+, tailored report +manual+call, or manual-only* conditions, delivered at home Proactive random digit dial of general population 1 1 21 76.0 15
Curry, Wagner, & Grothaus, 1991 Smokingg 1,217 3 dynamically tailored letters+ or brochure* delivered at home Respondents to fliers and announcements 3 3 12 95.0 16
Delichatsios & Friedman et al., 2001 Dieta,d
Phys Activity
298 Automated calls+ or physical activity control* conditions delivered at home HMO members contacted via mail and phone 11 6 6 50.0 18
Demark-Wahnefried & Clipp et al., 2007 Dieta,c
Phys Activityk
543 Tailored mailed print materials+ or nontailored mailed materials* delivered at home Proactively recruited cancer survivors from registries via letters 7 10 12 95.6 21
DiNoia & Contento et al., 2008 Dietc 549 4 CD-ROM tailored feedback interventions+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at youth agencies Students proactively recruited from after school programs 4 1 2 92.0 17
Dijkstra, 2005 Smokingf 202 Personalized feedback delivered through interactive computer+ or brochure* delivered at university Students proactively recruited through school 1 1 4 70.0 15
Dijkstra & DeVries et al., 1998 Smokingg 1,546 Self-efficacy and outcome tailored information+, self-efficacy tailored information, outcome-tailored information, or no information* conditions delivered at home Respondents to advertisements in newspapers in the Netherlands 1 1 14 64.0 15
Dijkstra, De Vries, & Roijackers, 1999 Smokingg 843 3 tailored letters, 1 tailored letter+, manual-only* or assessment-only conditions delivered at home Respondents to fliers and announcements 1 1 6 89.0 13
Elder & Ayala et al., 2006 Dietb 357 Tailored newsletters+, or tailored letters+counseling, or targeted brochure*, conditions delivered at home Proactive random digit dial of general population 12 3 12 79.0 17
Etter & Perneger, 2004 Smokingh 2,934 4 dynamically tailored letters+, brochure* or assessment-only conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited random sample of general population contacted by mail 4 12 24 82.2 12
Etter, 2005 Smokingg 11,969 Tailored feedback+ or information-only* conditions delivered through computer over Internet Respondents to smoking cessation website 1 2 3 35.0 17
Frenn & Malin et al., 2005 Dieta
Phys Activityk
132 Eight-session Internet/video intervention in school+ or assessment-only* conditions Students recruited via consent form sent to parents 8 1 1 77.0 15
Greaney & Riebe et al., 2008 Phys Activityn 1,274 Dynamically tailored letters+brief calls+manual+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Respondents to fliers and announcements 12 12 24 76.0 15
Haerens & Deforche et al., 2007 Dietb 307 Computer-tailored interactive intervention+ or assessment only* conditions Students recruited from secondary school classes 1 1 3 91.0 18
Hageman & Walker et al., 2005 Phys Activityk 31 3 tailored+ or nontailored* online newsletters Respondents to ads placed in newspapers 3 2 3 90.0 17
Heimendinger & Oneil et al., 2005 Dietc 3,402 4 dynamically tailored+, 4 tailored, 1 tailored letters, or brochure-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited callers to cancer info line 4 5 12 57.0 18
Irvine & Ary et al., 2004 Dietb,c 517 Tailored intervention at workstation+ or wait-list control* conditions Employees recruited via advertisements/fliers 3 1 2 90.0 17
Johnson, Driskell, Johnson, Dyment et al., 2006 Dietn
Phys Activityn
404 3 dynamically tailored letters + manual+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactive random digit dial of general population 3 6 18 58.0 14
Johnson & Paiva et al., 2008 Dietn
Phys Activityn
1,277 4 tailored letters+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactive random digit dial calls or respondents to advertisements 4 9 12 66.0 13
Jones & Edwards, 2003 Dietn Smokingn 1,029 Multiple tailored letters+ or brief physician advice* conditions delivered at home and clinic Respondents to posters in clinics and newspapers 12 12 12 77.7 16
King & Friedman et al., 2007 Phys Activityj 218 Tailored automated telephone feedback+, tailored human advice, or health education group* conditions HMO members contacted via mail and phone 15 12 6 86.7 18
Kosma, Cardinal, & McCubbin, 2005 Phys Activityk 151 4 tailored interactive website interventions+ or assessment-only* conditions Respondents to fliers and announcements 4 1 1 49.6 16
Kreuter & Strecher, 1996 Dietb
Phys Activityj
Mammographyi
Smokingg
1,317 Tailored letter+, behavioral feedback or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited medical clinic patients 1 1 6 86.0 15
Kreuter & Sugg-Skinner et al., 2005 Dietc
Mammographyi
416 720 Tailored+, culturally tailored letters, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited medical clinic patients 6 18 18 71.8 16
Kristal, Curry, Shattuck, Feng, & Li, 2000 Dietb,c 1,459 Tailored letter+manual+brief calls+ or assessment- only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members 2 12 12 87.0 18
Kypri & McAnally, 2005 Dietn
Phys Activityj
218 Web-based assessment and feedback+ or assessment only* conditions delivered at school Patients recruited from college health service 1 1 2 86.0 16
Lennox & Osman et al., 2001 Smokingh 2,553 Tailored letter+, personalized information or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Patients proactively recruited from medical clinic 1 1 6 78.1 15
Lipkus, Lyna, & Rimer, 1999 Smokingh 266 Tailored letter + advice + counselor call, tailored letter + brief advice+, or advice-only* conditions delivered at home and clinic Random sample of medical clinic patients 2 1 16 62.2 17
Lipkus, Rimer, Halabi, & Strigo, 2000 Mammographyi 1,934 Tailored letter+, counselor call, or reminder* delivered at home Sample of HMO members 1 12 12 96.0 16
Lutz & Ammerman et al., 1999 Dietc 710 4 tailored letters+, nontailored letters, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited from random sample of HMO members 4 4 6 80.8 18
Marcus & Bock et al., 1998a Phys Activitym 1,559 2 tailored letters+ or brochure conditions delivered at home Reactively recruited employees from worksite 2 1 3 73.0 16
Marcus & Napolitano et al., 2007 Phys Activityk 239 Telephone-based individualized feedback, print-based individualized feedback+, or contact control* conditions Reactively recruited employees via newspaper and workplace advertisements 14 12 12 85.4 17
McKay & King et al., 2001 Phys Activityk 65 8-week online tailored intervention+ or internet information-only* conditions Respondents to e-mail postings to diabetes specific UseNet groups, listserves, web sites, and on-line community groups 5 2 2 87.0 18
Meyer & Ulbricht et al., 2008 Smokingh 1,499 3 tailored letters+, brief physician advice, or assessment-only* conditions Proactively recruited patients in primary care clinics 3 6 18 61.9 16
Napolitano & Fotheringham et al., 2003 Phys Activityk 65 12 weekly tip sheets plus 3 months of access to an interactive web-based program+ or assessment-only conditions* delivered at home Employee respondents recruited from worksite advertisements 12 3 3 80.0 15
Nitzke & Kritsch et al., 2007 Dietc 2,024 2 tailored reports plus newsletters+ or mailed non-tailored pamphlet* conditions delivered at home Respondents to advertisements directed at low-income persons 4 6 12 62.0 19
Oenema, Tan, & Brug, 2005 Dietb,d,e 782 2 tailored feedback sessions delivered by CD-ROM+, brochure*, or assessment-only conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited employees from worksite 2 1 1 79.0 15
Owen, Ewins, & Lee, 1989 Smokingg 208 4 tailored letters+, brochure*, or assessment-only conditions delivered at home Respondents to fliers/announcements 4 1 9 88.0 13
Papadaki & Scott, 2005 Dietd,e 72 4 tailored dietary and psychosocial feedbacks+ or brochure* conditions delivered via internet Respondents to advertisements in newsletters, flyers, postings on the worksites’ Intranet and email 4 6 6 80.0 19
Patrick & Sallis et al., 2001 Dietb,c
Phys Activityk
148 2 tailored feedbacks + follow up letters or calls+ or tailored feedback* only conditions delivered at clinic and home Proactively recruited students from high schools 2 4 4 79.0 17
Peterson & Aldana, 1999 Phys Activityk 784 Tailored letter+, brochure*, or assessment-only conditions delivered at worksite Proactively recruited employees from worksite 1 1 2 67.0 10
Pinto & Friedman et al., 2002 Phys Activityj 298 6 dynamically tailored automated calls+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members via mail and phone 6 6 6 79.8 18
Prochaska & Sallis, 2004 Phys Activityk 138 Tailored feedback provided via computer in school+ or assessment-only* conditions Proactively recruited middle school students 1 1 3 99.0 14
Prochaska, DiClemente, Velicer, & Rossi, 1993 Smokingf 756 4 dynamically tailored letters+, dynamically tailored letters + manual + counselor call, brochure*, or manual conditions delivered at home Respondents to fliers/announcements 4 6 18 70.0 12
Prochaska, Velicer, Fava, Rossi, & Tsoh, 2001a Smokingg 4,144 3 dynamically tailored mailed reports+ or assessment only* conditions delivered at home Proactive random digit dial of general population 3 6 18 67.0 15
Prochaska & Velicer et al., 2001b Smokingh 1,447 3 dynamically tailored letters+, dynamically tailored letters + manual, dynamically tailored letter + manual + counselor call, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members via mail and phone 3 6 18 62.9 14
Prochaska & Velicer et al., 2005 Dietn
Smokingf
Mammographyi
5,407 3 dynamically tailored letters + manual+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited patients from medical clinic 3 12 12 75.0 16
Prochaska & Velicer et al., 2004 Dietn
Smokingg
2,460 3 dynamically tailored letters + manual+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited parents of participants in related student study 3 12 12 70.0 17
Rakowski & Ehrich et al., 1998 Mammographyi 1,864 2 dynamically tailored letters+, brochure, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members from list of enrollees 2 5 20 75.0 19
Rakowski & Lipkus et al., 2003 Mammographyi 2,023 Tailored letter at either 2 mos or 10+ mos post-assessment or reminder letter* delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members from list of enrollees 1 10 15 80.0 18
Rimer & Halabi et al., 2002 Mammographyi 1,287 2 dynamically tailored letters+, tailored letter + counselor calls, or reminder letter* delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members from list of enrollees 2 13 24 96.0 17
Saywell, Champion, Skinner, Menon, & Daggy, 2004 Mammographyi 1,390 Tailored letter+, tailored letter + counselor calls, or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited HMO members from list of enrollees 1 1 2 75.0 13
Schumann & John et al., 2008 Smokingg 485 3 tailored letters+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited from hospital population survey 3 6 24 71.4 18
Shiffman, Paty, Rohay, Di Marino, & Gitchell, 2001 Smokingh 4,209 Tailored print feedback + nicotine patch+, or manual + nicotine patch* conditions delivered at home Callers to quit line asked to participate 6 3 1 63.9 18
Skinner, Strecher, & Hospers, 1994 Mammographyi 489 Tailored letter+ or brochure-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited medical clinic patients 1 5 8 89.0 12
Smeets & Brug et al., 2008 Phys Activityj 936 Tailored letter+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at home Random population-based mailing 1 1 3 52.0 17
Strecher, Kreuter, Den Boer, & Kobrin, 1994a Smokingg 296 Tailored letter or brochure-only* conditions delivered at clinic Proactively recruited medical clinic patients 1 1 4 70.8 14
Strecher, Kreuter, Den Boer, & Kobrin, 1994b Smokingg 1,588 Tailored letter+ or assessment-only* conditions delivered at clinic Proactively recruited medical clinic patients 1 1 6 67.0 14
Strecher & Marcus et al., 2005 Smokingg 1,978 4 tailored print feedbacks + nicotine patch+ or manual + nicotine patch * delivered at home Recruited callers to cancer info line 4 6 12 43.9 17
Strecher, Shiffman, & West, 2005 Smokingh 3,971 3 tailored newsletters plus support email sent via email+ or informational website only* conditions delivered at home People who purchased nicotine patch and logged onto to suggested website 3 3 3 53.3 15
Velicer & Friedman et al., 2006 Smokingg 2,054 Tailored letter+, tailored letters + call, or manual-only* conditions in combination with patch delivered at home Proactively contacted from VA hospital population 1 1 30 61.0 16
Velicer, Prochaska, Fava, Laforge, & Rossi, 1999 Smokingh 2,882 2, 3, or 6 dynamically tailored letters, 1 tailored letter+, or manual-only* conditions delivered at home Proactively recruited from HMO member list 1 1 18 74.0 17
a

= % kCalories from fat;

b

= Fat FFQ;

c

= Fruit and Vegetable Servings/Day;

d

= Fruit Servings/day;

e

= Veg Servings/day;

f

= 24 hr point prevalence smoking abstinence;

g

= 7 day point prevalence smoking abstinence;

h

= 28 day point prevalence smoking abstinence;

i

= % adherent to mammography screening;

j

= % adherent to CDC physical activity recommendations;

k

= recalled minutes of physical activity;

L

= % increasing physical activity;

m

= % making progress in stage of change for physical activity;

n

= % reaching action or maintenance stages.

*

Indicates group to which intervention was compared

+

Indicates treatment group outcome used for analysis