Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct;40(2):191–204. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9202-8

Table 2.

Weighted mean effect sizes and homogeneity statistics for sexual risk reduction outcomes by assessment interval

Outcomea k d+ (95% CI) Homogeneity I2 index (95% CI)

Fixed effects Random effects Q p
Short-Term Assessment (4 to 13 weeks)
Condom use, overall 31 0.10 (0.07, 0.14) 0.09 (0.03, 0.15) 73.57 <.001 59% (39, 73)
No. of Sexual Partners 24 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) 0.08 (0.04, 0.12) 28.17 .21 0
Incident STDs 8 0.01 (−0.06, 0.08) −0.08 (−0.42, 0.27) 166.14 <.001 96% (94, 97)

Intermediate Assessment (22 to 39 weeks)
Condom use, overall 26 0.05 (0.02, 0.09) 0.05 (0.01, 0.10) 38.68 .04 0
No. of Sexual Partners 22 0.06 (0.03, 0.09) 0.05 (−0.01, 0.10) 33.87 .04 0
Incident STDs 21 0.13 (0.08, 0.18) 0.11 (0.01, 0.21) 79.98 <.001 75% (62, 84)

Long-Term Assessment (≥52 weeks)
Condom use, overall 13 0.03 (−0.00, 0.06) 0.04 (−0.03, 0.10) 33.44 <.001 64% (35, 80)
No. of Sexual Partners 11 0.06 (0.01, 0.11) 0.09 (−0.01, 0.18) 31.92 <.001 69% (41, 83)
Incident STDs 23 0.10 (0.08, 0.12) 0.10 (0.05, 0.14) 72.84 <.001 70% (54, 80)
Incident HIV 5 0.56 (0.54, 0.58) 0.64 (0.29, 0.98) 595.91 <.001 99% (99, 100)
a

Extreme effect size values were recoded (i.e., winsorized) for condom use at short- and long-term assessment, number of sexual partners at short-term and intermediate assessments, and incident STDs at intermediate and long-term assessments. The magnitude and direction of the weighted mean effect sizes including outliers were consistent with the results excluding outliers (except for incident STDs at intermediate assessment, random effects: d+ = 0.10, 95% CI = −0.01, 0.21).

Note. k, number of interventions. d+, weighted mean effect size. CI, confidence interval. Boldface text indicates statistically significant improvements among treatment compared with control patients.