Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 29;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-61

Table 2.

Interaction between care recipient's gender and care-giving arrangement in Cox proportional hazard models

Model I* Model II**
Variable names HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Care recipient's gender
 Female 1.00 1.00
 Male 3.97 (1.17 - 13.42) 0.027 5.13 (2.25 - 11.69) < 0.0001
Informal care-giving arrangement
 Spousal care 1.00 1.00
 Daughter-in-law care 4.09 (1.23 - 13.58) 0.022 4.40 (1.60 - 12.10) 0.004
 Other categories (biological daughter care/other relative care/living alone) 1.55 (0.45 - 5.39) 0.491 1.26 (0.55 - 2.90) 0.580
Interaction
 Male gender * Daughter-in-law care 0.09 (0.01 - 0.57) 0.011 0.08 (0.02 - 0.46) 0.004
 Male gender * Other categories 0.66 (0.14 - 3.11) 0.601

* No adjusting variables in this model.

** Adjusting care recipient's age, baseline care needs level, number of people living together, daycare service use, home-help servie use, home-visit nursing service use, home-visit nursing use, respite stay, and institutional care use