Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 29;10:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-10-61

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios of informal and formal setting in female care recipients in Cox proportional hazard models

Model III (without adjustment)* Model IV (with adjustment)
HR 95% CI HR 95% CI
Informal care-giving arrangement
 Spousal care 1.00 1.00
 Daughter-in-law care 4.14 (1.25 - 13.77) 4.15 (1.02 - 16.90)
 Biological daughter care 1.97 (0.51 - 7.62) 1.64 (0.37 - 7.21)
 Other relative care 1.76 (0.42 - 7.35) 1.85 (0.35 - 9.94)
 Living alone 0.76 (0.13 - 4.53) 0.46 (0.04 - 5.48)
Care recipient's age (continuous) 1.04 (1.00 - 1.09) 1.02 (0.98 - 1.08)
Baseline care needs level
 Assistance required 1.00 1.00
 Care needs level 1 1.26 (0.40 - 3.95) 1.41 (0.42 - 4.75)
 Care needs level 2 1.69 (0.49 - 5.77) 1.45 (0.40 - 5.30)
 Care needs level 3 2.80 (0.84 - 9.32) 3.25 (0.92 - 11.46)
 Care needs level 4 or 5 3.18 (0.96 - 10.59) 3.21 (0.81 - 12.74)
Number of people living together (continuous) 1.18 (1.01 - 1.38) 0.99 (0.78 - 1.25)
Daycare service use
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.71 (0.36 - 1.39) 0.51 (0.22 - 1.22)
Home help service use
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.61 (0.33 - 1.13) 0.64 (0.31 - 1.32)
Home-visit nursing service use
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 1.09 (0.54 - 2.23) 0.71 (0.28 - 1.80)
Respite stay service use
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.95 (0.47 - 1.89) 0.86 (0.38 - 1.94)
Institutional care service use
 No 1.00 1.00
 Yes 0.63 (0.31 - 1.29) 0.88 (0.38 - 2.05)

* Each HR was obtained separately variable by variable.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure