Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 7;3:167–178. doi: 10.2147/ott.s8147

Table 1.

The comparative efficacy of second-line agents in MCL (data from select Phase II trials)

Clinical trials in relapsed or refractory MCL N PR CR ORRa Significant AEb
Bortezomib21 141 26% (36/141) 6% (9/141) 47% Fatigue, thrombocytopenia, neuropathy
Bortezomib22 28 43% (12/28) 0 46.4%
Bortezomib23 29 21% (6/29) 21% (6/29) 41% (12/29)
Bortezomib24 10 40% (4/10) 0 50% (5/10)
Lenalidomide30 15 33% (5/15) 20% (3/15) 53% (8/15) Neutropenia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia
Thalidomide29 16 50% (8/16) 25% (4/16) 81% (13/16) Somnolence, neuropathy, constipation
Bendamustine + fludarabine25 9 66% (6/9) 33% (3/9) 100% (9/9) Leukopenia, neutropenic fever, thrombocytopenia, anemia
Bendamustine + rituximab26 16 25% (4/16) 50% (8/16) 75% (12/16)
Bendamustine + rituximab + mitoxantrone28 18 44% (8/18) 33% (6/18) 78% (14/18)
Temsirolimus31 27 37% (10/27) 4% (1/27) 41% (11/27) Thrombocytopenia, fatigue, hyperglycemia, dyspnea
Temsirolimus32 34 35% (12/34) 3% (1/34) 38% (13/34)

Notes:

a

ORR based on PR and CR.

b

Generally grade 3 or higher.

Abbreviations: N, number of patients with MCL evaluable for efficacy; PR, partial response; CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; AE, adverse events.