Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep;186(1):395–404. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.113878

TABLE 5.

QTL with overlapping CI between F3 and LHRF-F3 populations after QTL projection

Conventional F3
LHRF-F3
Chr Left marker Pos CI (cM) Left marker Pos CI (cM) CIC/L ratio
DGY (tons ha−1)
1 bnlg1083 70 56–84 umc1397 78.43 75.04–84.36 3.00
1 umc161 254 242–272 umc161 258.97 252.62–267.40 2.03
4 umc1101 212 186–230 csu9b 188.79 176.26–202.66 1.67
4 umc1532 219.44 215.18–224.41 4.77
GM (%)
3 umc1892 22 0–72 bnl13.05b 75.32 71.04–78.97 9.08
4 gsy4 68 62–76 mmc0471 68.65 65.65–78.15 1.12
SD (days)
1 umc84 282 268–292 bnlg2123 286.3 281.93–292.22 2.33
5 mmc0261 90 82–110 umc43 105.66 103.14–108.18 5.56
9 umc1137 200 180–208 umc1137 202.51 196.39–207.58 2.50

QTL of LHRF-F3 are projected on conventional F3 linkage map so CI are expressed in cM. The CIC/L ratio was obtained by dividing the conventional F3 CI by LHRF-F3 projected CI.