Table 2.
Clinico-radiologic category | Imaging changes grading | MRI changesa | Neurological statusb | Corticosteroids recommendationsc | Suggested follow-up |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | I | Hyperintense signal abnormality on FLAIR related to catheter tract or tip only; no new contrast-enhancement | No worsening | No change | Scheduled follow-up MRI and clinical assessment |
IIa | II | Mild contrast-enhancement (<1.0 cm or linear) related to catheter tract or tip | No worsening | Consider resuming or increasing based on imaging features | Repeat clinical assessment in 2–4 wks and MRI in 4–8 wks depending on clinical findings |
IIb | II | Mild contrast-enhancement (<1.0 cm or linear) related to catheter tract or tip | Worsening | Promptly resume or increase | Repeat MRI and clinical assessment in 2 wks |
IIIa | III | Moderate contrast-enhancement (1.0–3.0 cm) related to catheter tract or tip | No worsening | Promptly resume or increase | Repeat MRI and clinical assessment in 2 wks |
IIIb | III | Moderate contrast-enhancement (1.0–3.0 cm) related to catheter tract or tip | Worsening | Promptly resume or increase | Repeat MRI and clinical assessment in 2 wks |
IV | IV | Extensive contrast-enhancement (>3.0 cm) related to catheter tract or tip, with or without central hypointensity | Worsening | Promptly resume or increase | Repeat MRI and clinical assessment in 2 wks |
aContrast-enhancing lesions diameter include the central hypointensity, if present.
bNeurological symptoms/signs localization have to be related to prior catheter trajectory(ies).
cIncrement, maintenance dose, and duration of treatment are based on clinical findings (eg, neurological symptoms, severity of neurological signs, or interference with activity of daily living) and imaging features (eg, size of the abnormality, severity of mass effect, or proximity to eloquent brain parenchyma).