Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 29;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-54

Table 1.

Enrollment and completion rates of Tiers I, II, and III

Targeted enrollment; (% recruited northern, central) Actual enrollment (northern, central) Full data completion (northern, central) Only partial data completion (northern, central) Only minimal data completion (northern, central)
Tier I: year 1 only 5 survey elements 3-4 survey elements 1-2 survey elements
n = 750 n = 655 n = 580 n = 31 n = 39
(26%,32%) (499, 156) (87%,95%) (6%,2%) (7%,3%)

Tier I: longitudinal (years 1-3) 3 years 2 years ≤1 year
See above See above n = 252 n = 182 n = 221
(38%,41%) (25%,37%) (37%,22%)

Tier II: 15/18 monthsa 15-18 monthly surveys 10-14 monthly surveys 1-9 monthly surveys
n = 250 n = 250 95b 26 129
(77%,75%) (186, 64) (29%,63%) (11%,9%) (60%,28%)

Tier III: 8 visits over 4 seasonsb 4 collection periodsc 2-3 collection periods 1 collection period
n = 40 n = 47 n = 40 n = 4 n = 3
(34%,52%) (30, 17) (90%,76%) (7%,12%) (3%,12%)

a Full completion depended upon timing of enrollment into tier 2 as it was modified from 15 to 18 months.

b Includes participants (n = 53) who attempted to complete surveys but encountered issues with the internet survey.

c Each collection consisted of a set-up visit and a take-down visit at the beginning and end of a week. The goal was for four collection periods across a 16 month period.