Table 2.
Proportional-odds logistic regression models.
Model 1 OR [95%CI] p-value |
Model 2 OR [95%CI] p-value |
Model 3 OR [95%CI] p-value |
Model 4 OR [95%CI] p-value |
Model 5 OR [95%CI] p-value |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.45 | 4.42 | 4.28 | 4.25 | 4.14 | |
lnLAP | [3.42 to 5.79] | [3.36 to 5.80] | [3.28 to 5.58] | [3.24 to 5.58] | [3.17 to 5.40] p < 0.001 |
p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | ||
Male sex | -- | 1.78 | 1.88 | 1.72 | 1.79 |
[1.23 to 2.57] | [1.31 to 2.69] | [1.18 to 2.49] | [1.25 to 2.58] | ||
p = 0.002 | p < 0.001 | p = 0.004 | p = 0.011 | ||
Age (years) | -- | 0.99 | -- | 0.99 | -- |
[0.98 to 1.01] | [0.98 to 1.01] | ||||
p = 0.232 | p = 0.316 | ||||
SLD | --2; | -- | -- | 1.70 | 1.72 |
[1.20 to 2.41] | [1.21 to 2.44] | ||||
p = 0.003 | p < 0.001 | ||||
n | 588 | 588 | 588 | 588 | 588 |
p-Brant test | 0.560 | 0.518 | 0.704 | 0.273 | 0.331 |
p-HL none vs. intermediate + severe steatosis | 0.021 | 0.402 | 0.836 | 0.584 | 0.315 |
p-HL none + intermediate vs. severe steatosis | 0.236 | 0.383 | 0.398 | 0.594 | 0.676 |
AUROC | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.79 |
none vs. (intermediate + severe) steatosis | [0.74 to 0.82] | [0.76 to 0.83] | [0.76 to 0.83] | [0.76 to 0.83] | [0.76 to 0.83] |
AUROC | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
(none + intermediate) vs. severe steatosis | [0.74 to 0.82] | [0.75 to 0.83] | [0.76 to 0.83] | [0.76 to 0.84] | [0.76 to 0.84] |
BIC | 1015 | 1014 | 1009 | 1012 | 1007 |
Abbreviations: OR = odds ratio; 95%CI = 95% confidence intervals; p-value = p-value for the regression coefficient (exponentiated and presented as odds ratio); lnLAP = natural logarithm of the lipid accumulation product; SLD = suspected liver disease; p-Brant = p-value associated with the Brant test of proportional odds; p-HL = p-value associated with the Hosmer Lemeshow statistics of the 2 binary models underlying the proportional-odds model; AUROC = area under the ROC curve; BIC = Bayesian information criterion.