Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Genet. 2009 Jul 2;46(12):856–861. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.067892

Table 2.

Segregation of enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA)* among the entire cohort of 83 siblings

Number of SLC26A4 mutations in proband Number of siblings
Segregation ratio (95% CI)
Affected Unaffected
0 4 34 0.11 (0.043 to 0.24)
1 4 4 0.50 (0.21 to 0.79)
2 10 27 0.27 (0.15 to 0.43)
Total 18 65 0.22 (0.14 to 0.32)

CI, confidence interval.

*

Includes EVA inferred from outside evaluations and family history interviews.

The M1 ratio of 0.50 was significantly higher (p=0.02) than the M0 ratio of 0.11, but did not differ significantly (p=0.23) from the M2 ratio of 0.27.