Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2010 May 11;19(7):1025–1033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9669-6

Table 2.

Baseline health-related quality of life for study participants compared to the US population norm

Study sample (n = 87) US population norm
Physical functioning 80 (70–95) 90 (70–100)
Role physical, % ceilinga 73.6 70.9
Bodily pain 74 (52–100) 74 (61–100)
General health 72 (57–87) 72 (57–85)
Vitalityb 50 (40–65) 65 (45–75)
Social functioning 87.5 (75–100) 100 (75–100)
Role emotional,% ceilinga 67.8 71.0
Mental health 76 (68–88) 80 (64–88)
Physical component score, mean (SD)c 49.1 (7.7) 50.0 (10.0)
Mental component score, mean (SD)c 49.4 (9.4) 50.0 (10.0)

% percent, SD standard deviation

SF-36 domain scores for the study sample and for the US population norm are presented as median (interquartile range) except where indicated. The component scores are presented as mean (standard deviation). Given the demographics of the study sample (men and women, aged 25–70) we did not use an age-specific norm

a

% ceiling refers to percent with RP or RE = 100

b

the bootstrap calculated 95% confidence interval of the median (42.9–57.1) suggests that study population VT is significantly lower than US population norm

c

Physical component score and mental component score are standardized to a mean of 50 such that above or below 50 represents better or worse than the US population average (see text)