Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2010 May 11;19(7):1025–1033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9669-6

Table 4.

Final regression models showing the relationship between weight change and vitality change for both phases of the study

Variables Phase 1 vitality changea
Phase 2 vitality changeb
Regression coefficient (95% CI) P-value Regression coefficient (95% CI) P-value
Phase 1 weight change (kg) −2.05 (−2.93, −1.17) < 0.001
Vitality baseline scorec −0.50 (−0.65, −0.34) < 0.001
Phase 2 weight change (kg) −0.50 (−1.12, 0.12) 0.11
Vitality baseline scorec 0.37 (0.20, 0.53) < 0.001
Vitality score at the beginning of Phase 2 −0.61 (−0.79, −0.43) < 0.001

The dependent variables were the Phase 1 or Phase 2 vitality change score; the independent variables were the Phase 1 weight change and the Phase 2 weight change, respectively. For both phases, potential confounders tested included age, gender, education, occupation, marital status, self-rated health, presence of obesity-related comorbidities, age when first overweight, expected weight loss, number of prior weight loss programs (see Table 1 and text for more details)

a

The final model included Phase 1 weight change and vitality baseline score; N = 86; R-squared = 0.41

b

The final model included the vitality score at the beginning of Phase 2 and the vitality baseline score; N = 81; R-squared = 0.40

c

Vitality baseline score refers to the vitality score at the beginning of Phase 1