Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2009 May 9;32(4):646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.010

Table 2.

Spearman correlation of global and regional WMH with mobility performance scores

WMH Burden Total SPPB Score WS Score CR Score SB Score
rho (p) rho (p) rho (p) rho (p)
Total WMH 0.223 (0.027) 0.288 (0.004) −0.191 (0.058) −0.082 (0.422)
GCC-WMH −0.266 (0.008) 0.299 (0.003) −0.259 (0.01) −0.076 (0.454)
BCC-WMH −0.212 (0.035) 0.316 (0.001) −0.209 (0.038) 0.005 (0.959)
SCC-WMH 0.391 (6×10−5) 0.426 (10−5) 0.345 (4×10−4) −0.160 (0.114)
ACR-WMH −0.247(0.014) 0.296 (0.003) −0.220 (0.029) −0.119 (0.241)
SCR-WMH −0.257 (0.010) 0.339 (0.001) −0.246 (0.014) −0.075 (0.460)
PCR-WMH −0.216 (0.032) 0.279 (0.005) −0.203 (0.044) −0.016 (0.872)
ALIC-WMH 0.294 (0.003) 0.356 (0.0003) −0.265(0.008) −0.110 (0.280)
PLIC-WMH 0.283 (0.004) 0.343 (0.001) −0.247 (0.014) −0.093 (0.360)
CST-WMH −0.268 (0.007) 0.300 (0.003) −0.238 (0.018) −0.101 (0.320)
SLF-WMH −0.157 (0.120) −0.212 (0.035) −0.208 (0.039) 0.033 (0.749)

Significant rho values are in bold, set at α≤ 0.05 for total WMH and at α≤0.005 for the ten ROIs (Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons). Amount of WMH in SCC showed strongest and most significant correlation, particularly with the walking speed (WS) score.