Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2009 May 9;32(4):646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.010

Table 3.

Volumes and WMH burden of the ROIs

Mobility Groups
ROI Volume (mL) Normal (% WMH, n=33) Intermediate (% WMH, n=36) Impaired (% WMH, n=30)
GCC 9.42 ± 1.82 3.66 ± 2.92 c 4.16 ± 2.61 7.07 ± 6.30
BCC 10.10 ± 2.17 2.44 ± 2.29 c 2.78 ± 3.08 5.00 ± 5.18
SCC 10.98 ± 2.36 1.50 ± 2.00 a 1.90 ± 2.30 b 4.20 ± 4.00
ACR 7.73 ± 3.70 10.50 ± 10.17 c 9.80 ± 7.73 c 18.07 ± 15.18
SCR 8.00 ± 2.86 7.05 ± 7.40 c 8.18 ± 10.80 c 14.72 ± 14.98
PCR 4.95 ± 1.57 14.20 ± 15.90 c 15.60 ± 13.80 21.40 ± 17.90
ALIC 6.92 ± 2.25 2.21 ± 2.11 b 2.42 ± 1.92 c 4.98 ± 5.17
PLIC 8.19 ± 2.33 1.90 ± 1.70 c 2.50 ± 4.30 c 4.10 ± 4.40
CST 5.50 ± 1.16 2.30 ± 2.20 c 2.60 ± 1.90 4.50 ± 3.90
SLF 6.13 ± 2.80 3.7 ± 6.80 4.10 ± 6.50 8.80 ± 14.30

Significant differences (Mann-Whitney) with the impaired group were observed at

a

p<0.001

b

p<0.01

c

p<0.05