Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun;39(2):102–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.11.003

Table 2.

Effects of the experimental manipulation on anxiety, perceived performance, and observer ratings of the participants’ behaviour

Means (SD) High social anxiety
Low social anxiety
Increase (N=11) Decrease (N=12) Control (N=13) Increase (N=13) Decrease (N=12) Control (N =11)
Participants’ ratings
Anxiety (0–8) 6.0 (1.3) 3.0 (1.6) 4.5 (2.1) 2.7 (.9) 1.4 (.8) 1.6 (1.4)
Perceived success of conversation (0–8) 3.0 (2.4) 5.3 (1.4) 4.8 (1.6) 5.1 (1.3) 6.3 (.6) 6.1 (1.8)
Social performance (BCh) 77.1 (15.2) 48.8 (14.9) 55.8 (24.9) 42.4 (17.3) 26.4 (9.1) 27.4 (11.4)
Perceived bodily sensations during conversation (APQ) 44.5 (12.1) 17.4 (8.1) 31.0 (16.7) 23.9 (10.6) 11.6 (7.5) 15.0 (10.6)


Observer ratings of participants’ performance
Independent assessor (BCh) 44.5 (14.4) 35.9 (10.6) 41.7 (8.6) 32.3 (9.0) 24.0 (8.2) 30.6 (8.1)
Confederate (BCh) 40.6 (9.2) 31.5 (13.3) 40.4 (11.7) 27.5 (13.0) 13.5 (6.0) 30.3 (14.3)


Participants’ underestimation of their performance
Compared to independent assessor 32.6 (15.4) 13.3 (10.5) 17.2 (18.5) 10.2 (20.1) 4.0 (11.7) −3.3 (11.5)
Compared to confederate 40.0 (12.1) 18.5 (15.6) 21.7 (19.2) 13.7 (19.7) 13.0 (8.6) −2.9 (16.9)
Visibility of anxiety 4.3 (2.1) 1.5 (2.3) 2.8 (2.1) 2.5 (1.6) .2 (1.3) .5 (1.0)

APQ: Autonomic Perceptions Questionnaire; BCh: Behaviours Checklist.

Low scores indicate favourable ratings.