Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Aug 18;132(32):11058–11070. doi: 10.1021/ja910535j

Table 2.

Geometric and energetic analyses from MD for interactions of residues with large CSD and a trend in 1H NMR frequencies following the rank order in the binding enthalpy of the three complexes.

Src SH2-pYEEI Src SH2-cpYEEI Src SH2-fpYEEI
R175 Nη1-Hη11---O-P
<h-bond> a 2.082 2.100 2.078
<Ener> c −136.9 (6.0) −135.8 (6.7) −136.7 (5.8)
<rNO> b 2.69 (0.11) 2.67 (0.10) 2.68 (0.11)
E178 N-H---O-P
<h-bond> a .984 1.001 0.895
<Ener> d −11.9 (0.4) −11.7 (0.4) −10.8 (2.9)
<rHO> b 1.86 (0.19) 1.83 (0.14) 2.04 (0.63)
<rNO> b 2.82 (0.17) 2.78 (0.13) 2.97 (0.58)
+1 E N-H---O=C H201
<h-bond> a 0.889 0.586 0.876
<Ener> e −2.8 (0.1) −1.8 (1.0) −2.6 (0.2)
<rHO> b 2.03 (0.20) 2.65 (0.84) 2.10 (0.28)
<rNO> b 2.97 (0.18) 3.49 (0.73) 3.02 (0.23)
a

average number of hydrogen bonds per snapshot

b

average distance (Å) with standard error in parenthesis

c

average nonbonded energy (kcal/mol) between xpY(Cζ-O-PO3) and R175(Nη1111222122CζNεHε)

d

average nonbonded energy (kcal/mol) between xpY(Cζ-O-PO3) and E178(HNNCαHα)

e

average nonbonded energy (kcal/mol) between xpY+1(HNNCαHα) and Y202(OC)