Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 27;31(9):1339–1347. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20934

Table IV.

Results of discriminant and power analysis

Amnestic MCI vs. controls AD vs. controls
ROC AUC % MC Sens/Spec Power ROC AUC % MC Sens/Spec Power
ERC 0.74 30.1 0.75/0.68 0.28 0.78 35.2 0.72/0.62 0.90
Subiculum 0.72 37.0 0.70/0.60 0.12 0.75 25.3 0.72/0.75 0.91
CA1 0.74 28.7 0.75/0.70 0.51 0.80 30.0 0.67/0.72 0.99
CA1‐2 transition 0.83 20.5 0.85/0.77 0.97 0.81 30.0 0.72/0.70 0.98
Total hippocampus 0.72 31.5 0.70/0.68 0.35 0.75 28.7 0.61/0.75 0.98

% MC, percentage of subjects misclassified; Sens/Spec, sensitivity/specificity, AUC, area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic graphic (ROC); Power, power to the detect a difference between subjects diagnosed with MCI and controls (MCI), respectively, AD and controls (AD) at the significance level alpha = 0.05.

Please see text for ROC and sensitivity/specificity of CA1 in combination with CA1‐2 transition to discriminate between AD and controls.