Table 1.
First author | Year | Population | No. families | No. affecteds | GSMA weight | Linkage statistica | Diagnostic criteria | Diseaseb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Garner | 2006 | US | 160 | 562 | 1.95 | NPL | biopsy; antibodies; DH (3%)c | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Rioux | 2004 | Finnish | 54 | 168d | 1.04 | NPL | biopsy; antibodies; DH (13%)c | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Van Belzen | 2003 | Dutch | 67 | 142d | 0.84 | MLS | biopsy | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Popat | 2002 | UK, Sweden, other | 24 | 79d | 0.72 | NPL | ESPGAN criteria (biopsy) | symptomatic |
Liue | 2002 | Finnish | 60 | 159 | 0.97 | NPL | biopsy; DH (22%)c | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Naluaie | 2001 | Scandinavian | 70 | 156d | 0.90 | NPL | ESPGAN criteria (biopsy) | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Kinge | 2000 | UK | 16 | 50 | 0.57 | NPL | biopsy; antibodies | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
Grecoe | 1998 | I | 103 | 213d | 1.02 | MLS | biopsy; antibodies | symptomatic; asymptomatic |
MLS = Maximum likelihood statistic; NPL = non parametric linkage score
Studies included patients with symptomatic CD, or asymptomatic CD, diagnosed through screening but without the presence of well-defined CD symptoms
DH = dermatitis herpetiformis; percentage of DH cases among affecteds are indicated
Number of affecteds derived from information on number of affected sib pairs/trios etc or from the family trees of affected families
Study included in the previous meta/mega analysis by Babron et al. [7].