Skip to main content
. 2007 Oct 1;2007:2302.

Table.

GRADE evaluation of interventions for insomnia

Important outcomes Sleep improvement, quality of life, adverse effects
Number of studies (participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of non-drug treatments for insomnia in elderly people?
1 (36) Symptom improvement CBT v no treatment 4 –1 –1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for sparse data. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
1 (43) Symptom improvement Exercise v no treatment 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for sparse data
What are the effects of drug treatments for insomnia in elderly people?
14 (830) Symptom improvement Benzodiazepine v placebo 4 0 0 0 0 High
3 (339) Symptom improvement Benzodiazepine v benzodiazepine receptor agonists 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
3 (1019) Symptom improvement Zaleplon v placebo 4 –1 –1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
2 (815) Adverse effects Zaleplon v placebo 4 –1 0 0 0 Moderate Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results
5 (1667) Symptom improvement Zolpidem v placebo 4 –1 –1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
3 (1031) Symptom improvement Zolpidem v benzodiazepines 4 –1 –1 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results
2 (144) Symptom improvement Different doses of zolpidem compared with each other 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results
16 (1541) Adverse effects Benzodiazepine receptor agonists v benzodiazepines 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results, and for not reporting results separately for comparator
2 (495) Symptom improvement Zopiclone v placebo 4 –1 +1 0 0 High Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Consistency point added for dose response

Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = Observational; 1 = Non-analytical/expert opinion. Consistency: similarity of results across studies.Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes.Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio.