Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2010 Sep 17;142(6):930–942. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.030

Figure 5. Lef1 and Groucho2 suppress rdh1l in apcmcr zebrafish.

Figure 5

(A) Whole mount in situ staining for lef1, groucho2, tcf4 or groucho3 in apcwt and apcmcr embryos at 72hpf. Red arrow points to the intestine. (B) Whole mount in situ staining for fabp2, trypsin, rdh1l and irbp in apcmcr/control Mo, apcmcr /lef1 Mo and apcmcr /groucho2 Mo embryos at 72hpf. Groucho2 mo efficiency in Figure S5G. (C-D) ChIP for Lef1 on rdh1l promoter in apcwt and apcmcr embryos. (C) Schematic showing the Lef1 sites on the rdh1l promoter and location of the primer set P1 (containing Lef1 sites) and P2 (without Lef1 sites). (D) Graph showing fold enrichment of Lef1 occupancy at P1/P2 on rdh1l promoter in apcmcr embryos compared to apcwt at 72hpf. Lef1 values were normalized to ones obtained using a non-specific antibody and then expressed as fold enrichment compared to apcwt. Error bars indicate +/− SD. (E) Whole mount in situ staining for fabp2 and gata6 in 72hpf embryos injected with full length lef1 or dominant negative (deficient in β-catenin binding) lef1 mRNA alone or with groucho2 mRNA. See also Figure S5.