Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 23.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ Rev. 2010 Sep 1;100(4):1913–1928. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.4.1913

Table 5.

Category-Salience Treatment Effects Excluding Subjects Skeptical About Payments, Experiment 2

Panel A: Log Interest Rate
Whites
Native blacks
Immigrant blacks
Men
Women
Social Category Salient −0.7006* (0.3184) −0.6919 (0.4074) −0.3800 (0.3454) −0.4524 (0.3960) −0.0925 (0.3967)
1 Week vs. 2 Weeks −0.1964 (0.1468) −0.0943 (0.2228) 0.0968 (0.3586) −0.4452 (0.2289) 0.1797 (0.2271)
UMich −0.3345 (0.3012) −0.1665 (0.5126) −0.3111 (0.5760) −0.6460 (0.3728) −0.0089 (0.3928)
1 Week vs. 2 Weeks × UMich 0.0348 (0.2163) 0.0519 (0.2954) 0.9917 (0.5141) 0.3709 (0.2735) −0.4447 (0.2943)
Constant −2.3958** (0.2317) −1.6564** (0.2967) −2.4392** (0.3570) −1.8242** (0.2663) −3.0606** (0.3521)
σ̂ 1.7736 (0.1291) 1.4725 (0.2079) 1.0918 (0.1386) 1.4852 (0.1626) 1.7317 (0.1554)
N 272 84 56 152 160

Panel B: Risk Premium
Whites
Native blacks
Immigrant blacks
Men
Women
Social Category Salient −0.0583 (0.0507) 0.2298** (0.0778) −0.1062 (0.0887) −0.0888 (0.0725) −0.1133 (0.0674)
Larger Stakes 0.3098** (0.0488) 0.0442 (0.0920) 0.1088 (0.0741) 0.3027** (0.0658) 0.0938 (0.0660)
UMich −0.0083 (0.0493) 0.0332 (0.1171) 0.1101 (0.0868) −0.0522 (0.0684) −0.1616* (0.0628)
Larger Stakes × UMich −0.0308 (0.0673) 0.2042 (0.1480) 0.0915 (0.2166) −0.0383 (0.0972) 0.1596 (0.0929)
Constant 0.2091** (0.0413) 0.0474 (0.0818) 0.0919 (0.0832) 0.2171** (0.0511) 0.3025** (0.0554)
σ̂ 0.3986 (0.0196) 0.4087 (0.0391) 0.3513 (0.0525) 0.4047 (0.0272) 0.3961 (0.0256)
N 374 118 80 208 214

Notes: This table presents interval regressions where the latent dependent variable is the log continuously compounded interest rate required to defer payment receipt or the risk premium required to accept a gamble. We pool each subject’s two intertemporal choices together and each subject’s two risk choices together. Social Category Salient is a dummy for the race-salience treatment (first three columns) or the gender-salience treatment (last two columns). 1 Week vs. 2 Weeks is a dummy for if the intertemporal choice was between payments deferred for one week versus two weeks. Larger Stakes is a dummy for if the sure payout in the risky choice was $100. UMich is a dummy for whether the subject was recruited at the University of Michigan. The estimated conditional standard deviation of the latent dependent variable is denoted by σ̂. Huber-White standard errors, clustered by subject, are reported in parentheses below the point estimates. The final row of each panel reports the number of choices in the regressions.

*

Significant at the 5 percent level.

**

Significant at the 1 percent level.