Table 2.
Benchmark activity | Spendolini | Case 1: CCC | Case 2: CDU | Case 3: Radiotherapy |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Determine what to benchmark | + | + | + | + |
2. Form a benchmarking team | + | + | + | + |
3. Choose benchmarking partners | + | + | + | + |
4. Define and verify the main characteristics of the partners | - | - | + | + |
5. Identify stakeholders | - | - | - | + |
6. Construct a framework to structure the indicators | - | + | + | + |
7. Develop relevant and comparable indicators | - | + | + | + |
8. Stakeholders select indicators | - | + | + | + |
9. Measure the set of performance indicators | - | + | + | + |
10. Analyse performance differences | + | + | + | + |
11. Take action: results were presented in a report and recommendations were given | + | + | - | + |
12. Develop improvement plans | - | - | + | - |
13. Implement the improvement plans | - | - | + | - |
14. Evaluation of the implementation | - | - | + | - |
+ = used in benchmarking case study
- = not used in benchmarking case study