Skip to main content
. 2010 May 13;368(1918):2221–2236. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0038

Figure 10.

Figure 10.

Vulnerable window width for a=0.8 (numerical step Δb=0.005). (a) For the values of b inside the region S (compare to figure 5), the normalized vulnerable window width ρvw is plotted for five different stimulus widths δ. (b) The same data as in (a). Here, ρvwδ is plotted instead of ρvw. The results for different δ are very similar, with increased deviation only for the smallest value δ=0.05. The almost identical curves in (b) can be explained by the linear dependence of the ρvw found analytically by Starmer et al. (1993). Plus symbols on a solid line, δ=0.25; empty squares on a solid line, δ=0.2; dot-dashed line, δ=0.15; dashed line, δ=0.1; solid line, δ=0.05.