Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 13;14(4):R132. doi: 10.1186/cc9180

Table 2.

Response and expectations of the effect of SDD per study period

Nurses Physicians Total



1st 2nd 3rd P value 1st 2nd 3rd P value 1st 2nd 3rd P value
Response - no. (%) 372 (74) 339 (73) 313 (65) 85 (89) 89 (82) 79 (77)

Prior experience SDD - % 53 74 87 68 85 90

Effect SDD - no. (%)
 No effect 101 (33) 80 (26) 63 (22) 0.017 12 (14) 12 (14) 3 (4) 0.065 113 (29) 92 (23) 66 (18) 0.004
 Decrease pneumonia 135 (43) 151 (49) 165 (58) 0.002 64 (75) 71 (80) 65 (84) 0.354 199 (50) 222 (56) 230 (68) 0.001
 Increase resistance 68 (22) 68 (22) 48 (17) 0.209 14 (17) 19 (21) 21 (27) 0.247 82 (21) 87 (22) 69 (19) 0.624
 Decrease resistance 24 (8) 21 (7) 25 (9) 0.672 11 (13) 13 (15) 14 (18) 0.640 35 (9) 34 (9) 39 (11) 0.524
 Increase survival* 81 (26) 83 (27) 97 (34) 0.062 36 (42) 45 (51) 47 (61) 0.059
 Other 21 (7) 35 (11) 25 (9) 0.129 9 (11) 11 (12) 13 (17) 0.478 30 (8) 46 (12) 38 (11) 0.145

Median PRRM (IQR) 3.0 (0-25) 12.9 (0-25) 16.7 (0-28.5) 0.113

IQR, interquartile range; PRRM, presumed relative reduction in mortality; SDD, selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

* Increase survival physicians based upon calculation PRRM.

significance based upon chi-squared test (effect) or Kruskal-Wallis test (median PRRM).