Skip to main content
. 2010 Aug 5;14(4):R150. doi: 10.1186/cc9218

Table 1.

Quality assessment

Study Patients randomized Groups similar at baseline Groups treated equally All patients accounted for Assessor blinded or objective Intention to treat analysis TOTAL (max 6) Level of Evidence
Browder et al, 1990 [29] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Bulger et al, 2008 [19] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Croce et al, 1998 [24] 1 1 1 1 1 5 2b
de Felippe et al, 1993 [30] 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 2b
Douzinas et al, 2000 [32] 1 0* 1 1 1 0 4 2b
Dries et al, 1998 [18] 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 2b
Glinz et al, 1985 [20] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Livingston et al, 1994 [31] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Marzi et al, 1993 [25] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Miller & Lim, 1985 [14] 1 n.r. 1 1 1 0 4 2b
Nakos et al, 2002 [26] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Nathens et al, 2006 [21] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Polk et al, 1992 [22] 1 1 1 1 1 5 2b
Rhee et al, 2000 [23] 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 2b
Rizoli et al, 2006 [27] 1 0 1 1 1 0 4 2b
Seekamp et al, 2004 [16] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Vassar et al, 1991 [15] 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1b
Waydhas et al, 1998 [28] 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 2b

1 = yes; 0 = no; n.r. = not reported, the test group was older; * = the test group had a higher injury severity score, which was corrected for using a multiple regression model.