Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Metab. 2010 Sep 8;12(3):260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.08.004

Figure 6. Translation State Array Analysis of Heat Shock Responses in C. elegans.

Figure 6

(A) Schematic of Translation State Array experimental design. (B) Scatter plot of log2 wild type HS F3 versus daf-2(e1370) log2 HS F3 versus. Transcripts with significantly altered abundance were identified via t-tests and a FDR ≤ 0.05. Transcripts significantly increased in daf-2(e1370) shown in orange (n = number of data points) and those decreased shown in purple, r2 denotes the correlation coefficient and ** p<0.01. (C) Plot of Relative Abundance of the sdz-28 transcript in each fraction (F1-F3) under control (CTL) and HS treatments (HS). Each bar represent mean of 4 biological replicates. (D) Plot of Relative Abundance of the phat-4 transcript in each fraction (F1-F3) under control (CTL) and HS treatments (HS). Each bar represent mean of 4 biological replicates. (E) Scatter plot of log2 wild type CTL Ti (i.e. F3/F2) versus log2 wild type HS Ti.