Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 3;9:253. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-253

Table 2.

Relative bioavailability study - statistical analysis

Parameter Ratio (90% CI)*
Treatment A (dispersible tablet) vs B (crushed tablet) (primary analysis)
Artemether AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 0.94 (0.86-1.02) 1.03 (0.94-1.13) 1.17 (1.06-1.29)
Dihydroartemisinin AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 1.05 (0.99-1.11) 1.03 (0.93-1.15) 1.14 (1.04-1.24)
Lumefantrine AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 0.90 (0.85-0.95) 0.89 (0.84-0.94) 0.91 (0.86-0.96)
Treatment A (dispersible tablet) vs C (intact tablet) (secondary analysis)
Artemether AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 0.80 (0.71-0.90) 0.80 (0.73-0.88) 0.73 (0.65-0.82)
Dihydroartemisinin AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 0.78 (0.72-0.84) 0.69 (0.62-0.77) 0.65 (0.58-0.73)
Lumefantrine AUC0-inf AUC0-tlast Cmax 1.06 (0.96-1.16) 1.12 (1.02-1.23) 1.07 (0.97-1.18)

*Ratio (90% CI) = ratio of the geometric means and 90% confidence interval for the comparison of Treatments A vs B and Treatments A vs C, respectively.

A single oral dose of 80 mg of artemether and 480 mg of lumefantrine (4 tablets) was administered to healthy adults as follows: Treatment A, fully dispersed in water; Treatment B, swallowed with water after crushing to coarse particles; Treatment C, swallowed with water without previous crushing.