Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2010 Jun 8;117(10):1900–1907.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.059

Table 3.

Proportion of people with significant changes in National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 scores for individuals with 2 or more line changes in best corrected visual acuity of the better seeing eye as determined by the reliable change index.

Change in visual acuity between Los Angeles Latino Eye Study
baseline and follow-up examinations

Increase 2 lines VA
(N=31)
Loss 2 lines VA
(N=83)
Loss Improvement Loss Improvement

RCI<=−1.96 RCI>=1.96 RCI<=−1.96 RCI>=1.96
NEI-VFQ-25 N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
  Color Vision 4 (13) 10 (32) 21 (25) 13 (16)
  Vision Related Dependency 7 (23) 8 (26) 26 (31) 16 (19)
  Driving Difficulty 0 ( 0) 3 (38) 16 (42) 3 ( 8)
  Distance Vision 5 (16) 10 (32) 24 (29) 14 (17)
  General Health 11 (35) 8 (26) 22 (26) 14 (17)
  General Vision 7 (23) 11 (35) 32 (39) 17 (20)
  Vision Related Mental Health 7 (23) 9 (29) 26 (31) 10 (12)
  Near Vision 2 ( 6) 10 (32) 14 (17) 16 (19)
  Ocular Pain 5 (16) 12 (39) 13 (16) 16 (19)
  Peripheral Vision 9 (29) 10 (32) 27 (33) 22 (27)
  Vision Related Role Function 6 (19) 8 (26) 21 (25) 14 (17)
  Vision Related Social Function 3 (10) 7 (23) 20 (24) 10 (12)
  Composite Score 6 (19) 11 (36) 26 (31) 12 (15)

RCI= Reliable change index. VA=visual acuity.

Bolded number and percent indicate those NEI-VFQ scores with a large (30% or greater) percent of individuals with statistically significant change in score in the same direction as the direction of VA change.

Note: Percentage is for each line change group. For example, 31 participants increased 2 lines best corrected better seeing eye visual acuity, 11 (11/31=35.48%) participants had RCI between less than or equal to −1.96 subscale general health.

LALES = Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. NEI-VFQ-25 = National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.