Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;18(1):41–47. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2007.0703

Table 3.

Outcome Analysis Results. Unadjusted Rates and Adjusted ORs with 95% CIa Testing differences in % Mammography, CBE, BSE, and Screening Intentions between Intervention and Control Study Participants, Overall and for Statistically Significant Moderators

 
 
Unadjusted rates
Adjusted OR
    Intervention Control OR (95% CI)
Mammography Overall (n = 899) 73.1 75.1 0.89 (0.65, 1.22)
  By BC worry frequency** (n = 890)b      
   Rarely/never 68.1 75.3 0.62 (0.37, 1.04)
   Sometimes 73.7 79.1 0.80 (0.49, 1.30)
   Often/all the time 85.0 63.5 3.06 (1.22, 7.68)
CBE Overall (n = 773) 91.4 91.0 1.00 (0.60, 1.66)
  By education*** (n = 766)b      
   Less than high school 83.0 96.3 0.17 (0.03, 0.90)
   High school 89.0 89.4 0.82 (0.32, 2.07)
   College 93.8 91.3 1.50 (0.74, 3.05)
BSE at least 6 times Overall (n = 680) 56.8 57.6 0.95 (0.67, 1.33)
Definite intentions Overall (n = 677) 59.7 61.4 0.97 (0.70, 1.33)
a

Adjusted for clinic (used for stratified randomization) and the baseline value of outcome measure.

**Significance of interaction: p = 0.0115; ***significance of interaction: p = 0.0497.

b

Nine subjects missing worry frequency and 7 missing education at baseline cause missing values in analysis.