Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 10;11:457. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-457

Table 3.

Results using contig metrics for bounding read placement algorithm.

Contig count Contig N50 Contig bases
Species Control Bounded Alternate Control Bounded Alternate Control Bounded Alternate




E. coli O157:H7 6 5 NA 2,315,032 4,484,293 NA 5,656,811 5,661,119 NA
S. enterica 6 6 NA 3,620,140 3,620,144 NA 4,813,438 4,813,442 NA
B. mallei 19 19 NA 424,003 424,003 NA 5,835,215 5,834,616 NA
I. multifiliis 4,273 4,273 5,765 12,070 12,070 11,444 37,616,884 37,616,884 47,976,992
E. coli K12 313 314 387 27,255 27,255 16,838 4,679,711 4,679,711 4,441,778
C. amycolatum 26 26 38 307,040 307,040 152,524 2,525,388 2,525,392 2,507,351

Performance of the same three algorithms described in Table 1. Contig count: number of contigs whose consensus is at least 2Kbp. Contig bases: sum of consensus lengths for contigs at least 2Kbp long.