Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 Sep–Oct;34(5):684–688. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181e9e9dd

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A typical example showing the comparison of the perfusion images from SW-CG-HYPR and turbo-FLASH (TFL). With an R-R interval of 550 ms, SW-CG-HYPR method covered 6 slices compared to only 3 slices by conventional turbo-FLASH method. To compare the intensity changes and image quality, we matched the position of slice 2, 4 and 6 of SW-CG-HYPR images to the apex, mid-ventricular and basal images acquired with the conventional methods.