Table 5.
Predictors of Relationship Outcomes Using Multinomial Logistic Regression (Basecategory=Relationship Ended), Clustered by Respondent
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engaged/Married | On-Going | Engaged/Married | On-Going | |||||
| RRR | Sig | RRR | Sig | RRR | Sig | RRR | Sig | |
| (N =1,365) | (N =1,365) | |||||||
| RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS | ||||||||
| Male | 0.16 | *** | 0.70 | 0.18 | *** | 0.72 | ||
| R age (fst mon) | 1.27 | *** | 1.57 | *** | 1.29 | *** | 1.56 | *** |
| R highest edu (fst mon) | ||||||||
| Primary (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Secondary | 0.94 | 1.47 | 1.30 | 1.44 | ||||
| Some college | 1.76 | 2.34 | * | 2.09 | 2.25 | * | ||
| R in school (fst mon) | 0.52 | * | 0.52 | ** | 0.49 | * | 0.53 | ** |
| R ethnicity | ||||||||
| Luo | 0.79 | 1.81 | 0.68 | 1.76 | ||||
| Luhya | 0.66 | 1.29 | 0.44 | 1.30 | ||||
| Other (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| R Religion | ||||||||
| Catholic (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Protestant | 0.43 | ** | 0.84 | 0.39 | ** | 0.85 | ||
| Pentecostal | 0.52 | * | 0.92 | 0.40 | * | 0.89 | ||
| African/Traditional | 0.56 | 1.10 | 0.70 | 1.11 | ||||
| Muslims/Other/None | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.33 | 1.32 | ||||
| R Independent | 1.55 | 0.91 | 1.62 | 0.89 | ||||
| PARTNER CHARACTERISTICS & HOMOGAMY | ||||||||
| Age difference (male-female) | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.00 | ||||
| Education difference (male-female) | ||||||||
| Male less than female (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Male same as female | 1.28 | 1.02 | 1.58 | 1.02 | ||||
| Male more than female | 1.15 | 1.05 | 1.43 | 1.08 | ||||
| P in school (fst mon) | 0.52 | ** | 1.14 | 0.65 | 1.15 | |||
| Ethnic difference | 0.81 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.69 | ||||
| P economic status (fst mon) | ||||||||
| Poor (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Middle | 0.47 | ** | 1.34 | 0.50 | * | 1.34 | ||
| Wealthy | 0.24 | ** | 1.06 | 0.33 | * | 1.04 | ||
| RELATIONSHIP CHARACTERISTICS | ||||||||
| Relationship Type (fst mon) | ||||||||
| Serious (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Dating | 0.83 | 0.50 | ** | 1.12 | 0.50 | ** | ||
| Casual | 0.46 | * | 0.52 | ** | 0.55 | 0.51 | ** | |
| Duration | 1.04 | *** | 1.06 | *** | 1.04 | *** | 1.05 | *** |
| Marital Aspirations (fst mon) | ||||||||
| Does not want to marry (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Want to marry | 3.01 | *** | 1.18 | 2.87 | *** | 1.18 | ||
| Never considered marriage | 2.33 | ** | 1.01 | 2.33 | * | 1.05 | ||
| Reason for Entering Relationship (fst mon) | ||||||||
| Physical (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Emotional | 2.91 | ** | 1.23 | 2.48 | ** | 1.22 | ||
| Want partner/spouse | 3.59 | ** | 1.26 | 3.81 | ** | 1.25 | ||
| Other | 1.19 | 0.80 | 0.89 | 0.81 | ||||
| Had sex | 3.38 | ** | 0.42 | *** | 1.06 | 0.42 | *** | |
| Always used condoms | 0.44 | ** | 1.19 | 1.41 | 1.18 | |||
| Pregnancy | 12.96 | *** | 0.99 | |||||
| P had other partners | 0.20 | *** | 0.27 | *** | 0.18 | *** | 0.27 | *** |
| R had other partners | 0.21 | *** | 0.73 | 0.23 | *** | 0.76 | ||
| Interaction: R other partners* gender | 9.26 | *** | 3.02 | ** | 8.60 | *** | 2.90 | ** |
| Pseudo R2 | 0.31 | 0.35 | ||||||
| Log Pseudolikelihood | -827.5 | -785.5 | ||||||
R=Respondent, P=Partner
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.