Table 4. Regression Predicting Child Behavior as a Function of Child Sex, Care Provider Behavior and Their Interactions.
| Model 1: Anxious-Vigilant | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE B | B | SE B | B | SE B | |
| Child Sex | -.42** | .16 | -.27 | .14 | -.26 | .14 |
| Warm-Supportive | - | - | -.42*** | .08 | -.35 | .12 |
| Intrusive-Overcontrol | - | - | .06 | .09 | .11 | .12 |
| Sex * Warm-Supportive | - | - | - | - | -.14 | .17 |
| Sex * Instrusive-Overcontrol | - | - | - | - | -.11 | .17 |
| Model 2: Angry-Aggressive | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | |||
| B | SE B | B | SE B | B | SE B | |
| Child Sex | -.56*** | .17 | -.43** | .15 | -.43 | .14 |
| Warm-Supportive | - | - | -.46*** | .09 | -.44 | .12 |
| Instrusive-Overcontrol | - | - | -.08 | .09 | .17 | .12 |
| Sex * Warm-Supportive | - | - | - | - | -.04 | .17 |
| Sex * Instrusive-Overcontrol | - | - | - | - | -.52** | .16 |
Note. Model 1: R2 (Step 1) = .04. ΔR2 (Step 2) = .20. ΔR2 (Step 3) = .00. Total R2 = .24. Model 2: R2 (Step 1) = .08. ΔR2 (Step 2) = .17. ΔR2 (Step 3) = .07. Total R2 = .32. Only the highest-order terms are evaluated for significance. When the Sex * Warm-Supportive interaction is removed, both individual factors are significant.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.