Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2010 Jul 14;53(4):1181–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.020

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison of inverse consistency using different methods: FLIRT LS: least squares, CR: correlation ratio, MI: mutual information, SPM, LS (our implementation with least squares instead of robust error function), Robust registration, Robust-I (+intensity scaling) and Robust-I-SS (subsampling on the highest resolution). The white circles represent the individual registrations.