Table 3. Comparisons of Attachment Distributions in the Prison Nursery Sample to Meta-analyzed Distributions of Low-SES and Clinical Samples.
Comparison Group |
Number of Participants Included in Comparisons |
Two-way (F versus non-F) Prison nursery relative to comparison samples |
Three-way (F, Ds, E) Prison nursery relative to comparison samples |
Four way (F, Ds, E, U) Prison nursery relative to comparison samples |
---|---|---|---|---|
Low-risk mothers (nonclinical) a |
Total = 748 Two-way = 700 Three-way = 748 Four-way = 700 |
χ2 (1, N = 69) = 12.77, p< 0.001 |
χ2 (2, N = 69) = 9.83, p < 0.001 Fewer F (41% vs 58%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 8.62, p < 0.01 More E (32% vs 19%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 6.63, p ≤ 0.01 |
χ2 (3, N = 69) = 15.27, p < 0.01 Fewer F (35% vs 56%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 12.01, p < 0.001 More E (13% vs 9%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 9.01, p < 0.05 More U (30% vs 18%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 6.38, p < 0.05 |
Low SESb | Total = 411 Two-way = 350 Three-way = 411 Four-way = 350 |
χ2 (1, N = 69) = 9.01, p < 0.01 | χ2 (2, N = 69) = 6.77, p < 0.05 More E (32% vs 20%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 5.39, p < 0.05 |
χ2 (3, N=69) = 3.21, ns. |
Clinicala | Total = 1965 Two-way = 1854 Three-way = 1965 Four-way = 1854 |
χ2 (1, N = 69) = 7.17, p< 0.01 | χ2 (2, N = 69) = 6.38, p< 0.04 More F (41% vs 27%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 6.01, p < 0.05 |
χ2 (3, N = 69) = 9.34, p< 0.03 More F (35% vs 21%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 7.17, p < 0.01 Less U (30% vs 43%) χ2 (1, N = 69) = 4.73, p < 0.05 |
Note. Secure = F; Dismissing = Ds; Preoccupied = E; Unresolved = U
based on van IJzendoorn, 1996